Question on the differentiation between a Network line from Radial

AI Thread Summary
A line is considered radial if it provides a single path for power to flow from the source to the load, meaning there is only one connection point for the power supply. If a circuit can be fed from two sources simultaneously, it is not purely radial, as it allows for multiple paths. The discussion highlights that a U-shaped schematic can represent two radial feeds if certain switches or breakers are always kept open, ensuring only one path is active at a time. The concept of mesh is introduced as the opposite of radial, illustrating a network with multiple interconnections. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for interpreting circuit diagrams accurately.
EverGreen1231
Messages
75
Reaction score
11
I have been told that if the line connects breaker to breaker, it is considered to be radial; but, this doesn't make sense to me. If a line is connected by two feeders then there would be two sources of power, hence "Radial". I'm not sure if I'm missing some minute detail that makes the whole issue clear itself, or if I'm simply being overly dense. Admittedly, circuit diagrams have always given me pause, even after having spent enough hours studying them to make a preacher cuss.

Again, I'm not sure that I'm not trying to get to my thumb through my elbow.

I have attached an image of what I'm talking about.
 

Attachments

  • questiononpowersystems.jpg
    questiononpowersystems.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 517
Engineering news on Phys.org
The feed is radial if there is only one path for power to flow from sources to the load.

One path at a time. The U shaped schematic shown in your attachment could feed from two directions if all switches and breakers were closed, but it is operated such that some switch or breaker is open always so that the U becomes two radial feeds.

The opposite of radial is mesh. Think of the crisscross grid of copper window screen.
 
  • Like
Likes Fisherman199
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top