Question on the relationship between intensity of sound, amplitude and 1/r^2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between sound intensity, amplitude, and distance from a sound source. It clarifies that while the total power emitted by a speaker remains constant, the intensity of sound decreases with distance due to the 1/r^2 relationship. This decrease in intensity leads to a corresponding decrease in amplitude, as intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude. The confusion arises from the distinction between total power and intensity at a specific point, with intensity being the relevant measure. Ultimately, understanding these relationships resolves the initial confusion about amplitude changes with distance.
aznking1
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose sound wave is emitted uniformly in all directions by a speaker.

At a distance of 1.1m, the amplitude of it sound is 1.2x10^-8m

What is the amplitude of sound at a distance of 1.7m?

The Attempt at a Solution


What I'm confused is why does the amplitude of sound change? Isn't intensity = Power/Area? So at a greater distance, it just means that intensity is lowered. But power from a source is always constant isn't that right? And since power is proportional to amplitude squared, why does the amplitude decrease? am i missing out something?

The answer is 7.8x10^-9 using the relationship of intensity proportional to amplitude^2 and 1/r^2 if you are curious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't intensity = Power/Area? So at a greater distance, it just means that intensity is lowered.
Lower intensity at some specific point corresponds to a lower amplitude at that point. Meters as unit looks odd, I would expect Pa (pressure), but that should be irrelevant.
But power from a source is always constant isn't that right?
Constant in which way? I think you mean the total power here.
 
mfb said:
Lower intensity at some specific point corresponds to a lower amplitude at that point. Meters as unit looks odd, I would expect Pa (pressure), but that should be irrelevant.

Constant in which way? I think you mean the total power here.

Ahh okay. I think i get it now after reading your post and thinking for so many hours.

Firstly, the formula intensity = power/area gives the power at a particular point. If we were to sum all the points ( surface area of a sphere), we would get the total power of the source, which is always constant

Hence, as distance increases, the intensity at a point decreases, meaning power at the specific point decreases, and so amplitude decreases, as you have mentioned.

Thank you! now i can get a good night's sleep haha... assuming i am correct
 
That is right.
Small issue: "Power at a specific point" is not meaningful. Intensity is. If you integrate that, you get a power.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top