Question on Time Dilation for Traveling Observers

dako7
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I just had a quick question on time dilation that I'm stumped on.

There are three observers: two are traveling on separate ships traveling close to the speed of light (their speeds are the same) in opposite directions parallel to each other. One observer is standing still on a space station in between both ships. There are three large clocks, one connected to one ship, one connected to the other, and one connected to the space station. The observer on one of the ships takes out some binoculars (assuming they are able to) and looks the two other clocks in comparison to his own. What will they see?

Well, this observer would notice that the clock on the space station is moving much slower than his own, but what would they see the other ship's clock doing? Because it is traveling at the same speed, albeit in the opposite direction, would the clock be running at the same speed? Or slower?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dako7 said:
I just had a quick question on time dilation that I'm stumped on.

There are three observers: two are traveling on separate ships traveling close to the speed of light (their speeds are the same) in opposite directions parallel to each other. One observer is standing still on a space station in between both ships. There are three large clocks, one connected to one ship, one connected to the other, and one connected to the space station. The observer on one of the ships takes out some binoculars (assuming they are able to) and looks the two other clocks in comparison to his own. What will they see?

Well, this observer would notice that the clock on the space station is moving much slower than his own, but what would they see the other ship's clock doing? Because it is traveling at the same speed, albeit in the opposite direction, would the clock be running at the same speed? Or slower?

Each observer has his own frame of reference and would see the other clocks as running slower than his own.
 
Awesome, thank you so much. :)
 
Let's call the speed of each ship relative to the station β, a fraction of the speed of light. Then each ship will see the station's clock running slower according to the Relativistic Doppler Factor:

√[(1-β)/(1+β)]

And they will each see the other ship's clock running slower by the square of this factor or simply:

(1-β)/(1+β)

And the station will see each ship's clock running slower by the first factor.

EDIT: This is assuming that the ships and the station are in line with one another and that the ships are traveling away from the station.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top