Question on Transfer Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter doublemint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences in graphs produced by simplifying a transfer function (TF) versus using its original form in software like Mathematica and Excel. The closed-loop transfer function G' is derived from an open-loop TF G and feedback loop H, with a specific example provided. Participants clarify that while the mathematical forms of G' are equivalent, discrepancies in the resulting Nyquist and Bode plots can arise from input errors or simplification mistakes. The importance of understanding the relationship between Nyquist and Bode plots is emphasized, particularly in assessing system stability. Ultimately, the user resolves their confusion by identifying input errors in their graphing attempts.
doublemint
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Just a simple question on Transfer Functions.

If I was give a open loop TF, G, and a feedback loop H, then the closed loop TF is G'=\frac{G}{1+GH}.

So my first attempt was to simplify the G' by hand and then plot it in excel which produced a crescent shaped moon.
By simplification, I mean this:
Let G=1/s and H=1/(s+1)
G'=\frac{G}{1+GH}=\frac{1/s}{1+\frac{1}{s}+\frac{1}{s+1}}=\frac{s+1}{s(s+1)+1}
But, then I go to mathematica and enter the G' without simplification (just \frac{G}{1+GH})and it gave me a totally different graph.

Even though the the G' is the same (mathematically) in both cases, why does the Nyquist (and thus Bode) plots are different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doublemint said:
By simplification, I mean this:
Let G=1/s and H=1/(s+1)
G'=\frac{G}{1+GH}=\frac{1/s}{1+\frac{1}{s}+\frac{1}{s+1}}=\frac{s+1}{s(s+1)+1}

That looks fine except the second step looks to be a typo with the second '+' in the denominator meant to be multiplication.

Even though the the G' is the same (mathematically) in both cases, why does the Nyquist (and thus Bode) plots are different?

What kind of graphs did you do? Obviously they should be the same whether you use excel or mathematica.

Bode plots have increasing frequency on the horizontal axis and present the gain and phase of a complex quantity as w varies in a typical graph form. A nyquist plot, on the other hand, is essentially a polar plot that traces the value of a complex quantity in the complex plane as w varies.

Usually the nyquist plot is done on the loop gain GH to find out if there are poles in the right half plane of the overall function G/(1+GH). You can get similar information from a bode plot of GH too but, as mentioned, the bode plot is like a standard graph whereas the nyquist plot is a polar plot.

You can think if their similarity like this: a Nyquist plot is looking to see if a polar plot of GH encircles the point -1 to determine stability. In a bode plot of GH, the magnitude of GH should be less than 1 when the phase is 180 degrees (pi). The point -1∠0 in the nyquist plot occurs at phase 180 degrees and there will be no encirclements of -1 if |GH| < 1 when the phase is 180 degrees. So you can see the gain/phase conditions on GH in the bode plot are the same as the encirclement of -1 test in the nyquist plot.
 
Last edited:
I did Nyquist.
Yeah you are correct. I just tried the simplified equations I posted and did another graph with functions of more complexity and both Nyquist plots are the same..

I guess I typed something in wrong :(

Thanks for the help though!
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top