Question regarding pulse waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueberrynerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulse Waves
AI Thread Summary
A pulse wave is characterized by multiple wavelengths, including peaks and valleys, within a wave packet envelope. A single beat does not constitute a complete pulse wave, as it lacks the necessary complexity and structure. The envelope of a pulse wave is significantly smaller than the overall system. Understanding the distinction between a single beat and a pulse wave is crucial for accurate analysis. Therefore, a single beat cannot be classified as a pulse wave.
blueberrynerd
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Would a single beat be considered as an example of a pulse wave?

:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A single beat of what? A pulse wave typically has many wavelengths (peaks and valleys) of the fundamental frequency inside an wave packet envelope, but the envelope is very small compared to the system you are using.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top