Question regarding Rutherford's atomic model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the equation Ve = 2Vα in the context of Rutherford's atomic model. Participants clarify that this equation is a conclusion derived from the conservation of momentum and energy during elastic collisions, rather than an assumption. The correct approach involves setting up the equations for an elastic collision in one dimension and solving for the final velocities of the particles involved, particularly under the condition that one mass is significantly larger than the other. This method leads to a clearer understanding of the relationship between the velocities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions in physics
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum and energy principles
  • Basic knowledge of algebra and binomial expansion
  • Concept of mass ratios in collision scenarios
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations governing elastic collisions in one dimension
  • Learn how to apply conservation laws in collision problems
  • Explore the implications of mass ratios in collision outcomes
  • Investigate the historical context and implications of Rutherford's atomic model
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of atomic models and collision theory.

daselocution
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ScreenShot2013-02-24at100839PM_zps1ff6fa80.png


I am basically wondering how they got to the assumption that the Ve = 2Vα. I've tried it a few times and I keep on getting that based off of their other assumptions, Ve should =0, even though I know that this cannot possibly be the case.

Homework Equations



Conservation of momentum: Mava = Mav'a + meve

Conservation of energy: .5Mava2 = .5Mav'a2 + .5Meve2

The Attempt at a Solution



I really don't know what to do. I've tried starting under the assumption as given that Va≈Va', which leads to getting Ve=0. I tried to do a binomial expansion using the fact that Me<<Ma, but again I got zero. I'm really not sure how to approach this. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daselocution said:
I am basically wondering how they got to the assumption that the Ve = 2Vα.
It's not an assumption, it's a conclusion.

Set up the equations for an elastic collision in one dimension, then get a general solution for the final velocities of both particles. Don't put in any numbers or the like, just get a general solution. Then assume that m_1 &gt;&gt; m_2, and see what you get for v_{2f}.
 
Thank you very much. That makes much more sense, I'm not really sure why I didn't just do that the first time. My mistake was not solving for Valpha' in terms of the other equations. Once I realized that I had to do that, it was much clearer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K