Question related to Optical Waveguides and power

AI Thread Summary
In a 2D COMSOL mode analysis of an optical waveguide, determining the power of the guided mode involves understanding the Poynting vector, which represents the radiant power density. The Poynting vector is calculated as the cross product of the electric field vector E and the magnetic field vector H. To find the average energy flux, one must take the time-average of the Poynting vector if the time dependence is not already factored out. The total power can then be obtained by integrating this time-average Poynting vector over the relevant cross-sectional area of the waveguide. This approach clarifies the distinction between optical radiant power and electrical power.
nordmoon
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I am doing a 2D COMSOL mode analysis of an optical waveguide.

The mode analysis shows you the electric/magnetic field and you want to find out the power of the guided mode. How could I do this?

Power is P = I*V or dE/dt with units of Joules per second. In the FEM simulation I have given the wavelength, the dimensions and geometry of my waveguide. I know nothing about the current or voltage... I am missing something here?

Is power the same as electric potential energy? What is the difference?

My simulations give me the refractive index for each mode solutions and plots of the electric or magnetic fields. Shouldn't I just be able to integrate the area of interest? Not sure if that would give the power.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The power you want is the optical radiant power, not the electrical power. The Poynting vector is the radiant power density and is equal to the cross product of the electric field vector E and the magnetic field vector H at each point in space. If the computational codes present the fields without the time dependence already factored out, you will need to take the time-average of the Poynting vector to get the average energy flux. To get the total power, integrate the time-average Poynting vector over the cross-sectional area of interest (e.g. the output face of the waveguide).
 
You are correct, thank you. I forgot about the Poynting vector.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top