Questions about a particle shot off of a rotatiting disc.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2slowtogofast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Particle
AI Thread Summary
A rotating disc with angular velocity w has a particle dropped at half the radius, experiencing centripetal acceleration of Ac(@.5r) = rw^2/2. To determine how long it takes for the particle to be shot off the disc, one must consider that the particle, when dropped perpendicularly, does not move due to the assumption of no friction. The acceleration for circular motion at radius (r/2) is a = 2rw^2, but without initial tangential velocity, the particle remains stationary. Consequently, the particle will not exhibit any motion, including circular motion, while on the disc. The scenario illustrates the importance of initial conditions in analyzing motion on a rotating system.
2slowtogofast
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
Say you have a disc that rotates with angular velocity w. Assume that you know the value of w and the radius of the disc. You drop a particle on the disc while it is rotating half way out from the center of the radius. So the the centripetal acceleration on the particle is

Ac(@.5r) = rw^2/2

How can you go about finding how long in terms of rotations will it take the particle to be shot off the disc ignoring friction. This is not a specific problem just somthing I have been thinking about.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first of all, the accerlation the ball feels if it were to move in circular motion with radius (r/2) would be a = 2rw^2

second, if you drop ball directly onto the disc, ie. the trajectory of the fall is perpendicular to the plane of the disc, then the ball would not move, because you told us to ignore friction.

In other words, the ball wouldn't exhibit circular motion, let alone motion at all.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top