Questions about EMP Effects in Spacecraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phil_B
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A limited nuclear exchange in space may not produce a significant EMP due to insufficient atmospheric volume for the Compton Effect to create a charge gradient. The presence of air is not the primary factor in generating EMP; rather, it depends on the distribution of Compton electrons. Individuals inside a spacecraft would likely experience electrical equipment failure, but the risk of electrocution from contact with metal surfaces is minimal due to rapid charge equilibrium in the limited atmosphere. Protection against EMP effects can be achieved by disconnecting long wires and using sensitive equipment in a properly insulated Faraday cage, which does not necessarily need to be earthed. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately depicting the consequences of a nuclear EMP in a science fiction narrative.
Phil_B
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I’m a wannabe scribbler of Science Fiction trying to get things right in a story I’m working on...so I thought the best idea was to come and ask the experts and those who know far more than I ever will in a place such as here.

Ok I’m now done with the flattery, but it will hopefully get me somewhere ;-)

Basically I’m working with a limited nuclear exchange in space. Is there likely to be enough air in a spacecraft for enough of a Compton Effect to produce a significant EMP or am I looking at needing a planetary volumes of atmosphere to produce anything approaching destructive levels.

Secondly, with a nuclear produced EMP am I looking at any noticeable effects for those living within such a tin can, other than the destruction of electrical equipment? Are there going to be people electrocuted, because they were in contact with metal surfaces when the blast occurred, would someone who was not touching any surfaces be carrying a charge after the blast or would the limited volumes of atmosphere mean a rapid return to equilibrium?

Last one... other than the pulse directly fed into a system via antenna and communication dishes, I know that if there is an EMP I’m looking at problems caused by induced currents in long wires due to the low frequencies, gaps in electronic casings acting as wave guides for the higher frequencies. Is protection as simple as disconnecting long wires and having more sensitive electrical equipment in a sealed tin box (though insulated from the box itself)? Would this 'Faraday box(?)' have to be earthed?

Thanks very much,

Phil
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not the air, per se, that causes EMP. There are two requirements for EMP: (1) the existence Compton electrons and (2) a gradient in Compton electrons on the scale of the range of the the photons. E.g. you would have no EMP in a perfectly uniform atmosphere (given a symmetric explosion) because there would be no dipole moment to the charge distribution.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top