How Does Shell Theorem Apply to Asymmetrical and Perforated Shells?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zarmewa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Shell Theorem to asymmetrical and perforated shells. It highlights a critical distinction between the "force on the particle" and the "force between particles," emphasizing that the net force on a point mass at the center of a spherical shell is zero. However, the force between the shell and the point mass theoretically approaches infinity due to the distance being zero. The applicability of the Shell Theorem to hemispherical shells or shells with irregularities is questioned, with a consensus that it does not apply in these cases. Overall, the discussion clarifies misconceptions about force interactions within and around shells.
zarmewa
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
INSIDE SHELL

Not sure if it is done erroneously or blatantly but there is a mammoth difference between

“Force ON the particle” and “Force BETWEEN the particles”

Therefore just suffice it to say that the net force ON the point mass at exact center of the spherical shell is zero but the force BETWEEN shell and point mass is F=GMm/r^2=infinity, because the on center distance of the shell and the point mass coincides id est r = zero

Similarly, would the praxis be amenable to hemispherical shell or quasi cross-section, disorderly holes in the spherical shell and asymmetrical shell?
__________________________
Eclectic Eccentric Khattak No.1

GO
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zarmewa said:
Therefore just suffice it to say that the net force ON the point mass at exact center of the spherical shell is zero but the force BETWEEN shell and point mass is F=GMm/r^2=infinity, because the on center distance of the shell and the point mass coincides id est r = zero
Nope. You cannot treat the mass of the shell as if concentrated at its center when trying to find the force it exerts on a mass within the shell. (And your distinction between force "on" and force "between" doesn't make sense when talking about a point mass within the shell.)
 


Is shell theorem applicable to hemispherical shell or quasi cross-section, disorderly holes in the spherical shell and asymmetrical shell?
 


zarmewa said:
Is shell theorem applicable to hemispherical shell or quasi cross-section, disorderly holes in the spherical shell and asymmetrical shell?
No..
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top