Questions about the Intel Skulltrail motherboards.

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Intel "Skulltrail" motherboards, designed for dual CPU configurations, do not currently support Core i7 or future Core i9 processors, as they would require a complete redesign due to the integrated memory controller in these CPUs. The existing Skulltrail platform utilizes FB-DIMM memory, which has high latency and is limited to DDR2, making it less suitable for modern gaming needs. While building a high-end system with dual Core i7 or i9 processors and advanced graphics cards like the Radeon HD 5870 X2 or NVidia GTX 300 series is appealing, the cost could exceed $10,000. However, for most gaming applications, an overclocked dual-core processor is sufficient, and investing in a Skulltrail system may not provide the best value. The platform may be better suited for tasks like movie making or 3D rendering rather than gaming, where more cost-effective alternatives exist.
The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Questions about the Intel "Skulltrail" motherboards.

The Intel "Skulltrail" motherboards, which have two physical CPU sockets, do they make versions of this motherboard which support the Core i7 processors? Will they eventually release skulltrail motherboards which support the future Core i9 "gulftown" processors?

What kind of computer case would have mounts for this type of motherboard? In the future, I was hoping to build a skulltrail computer with two Core i7 or Core i9 extreme editions, with quad crossfire Radeon HD 5870 X2, or the NVidia GeForce GTX 300 series equivalent.

I see a skulltrail Core i7/i9 platform as being necessary for properly handling the humongous throughput of the DX11 graphics cards, especially in Xfire/SLI. Will I probably be spending more than $10,000 on building such a computer?

If I have a lot of money, and willing to spend it, should I go for it?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org


I'd advise against it. Adding more and more cores doesn't increase the amount of information that can be fed for graphics unless the program (or game) can actually make use of the additional cores in the first place. Processor speed/power currently isn't as big of a factor as graphics. An overclocked dual core processor is still more than enough for 90% of the games out there. I haven't seen any information that mentions it supporting i7's or i9's, unless something has come out in the past few months. The FB-DIMM memory is also a big negative for the Skulltrail. Being a holdover from workstation platforms, it generally suffers from high latency and low read speeds. That, and it's DDR2 only. If they were going to make a model that actually supports i7s, they would have to change the motherboard layout it's self due to the integrated memory controller on the i7s. Ie; an entirely new board from the ground up.

It would make a good computer for movie making or 3D rendering. Other than that, save your money and build a system with similar gaming performance for much less money.
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top