Questions, Why, Practical Applications Higgs Boson

ratfinksax
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Firstly, an open statement to everyone in this forum.

I am in search of some answers to questions I have so that I may have a better understanding of this research.

For this reason I have posted this so that through all of you my lack of education or some may refer to ignorance I may be enlightened.

I will never intend to come across condescending and if I do please feel free to speak your mind.

It is important to me and maybe others that I understand your responses and gain knowledge to my questions.

QUESTIONS:
1. Why is the discovery of the Higgs Boson so important?
2. What are the practical applications if this is discovered?

Hopefully, these are not rhetorical questions. I have not been able to find anyone who has offered a good answer as of yet for either of these questions.

Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ratfinksax said:
1. Why is the discovery of the Higgs Boson so important?

It represents an experimental test of the theorized Higgs-mechanism in the standard model of particle physics.

2. What are the practical applications if this is discovered?

For now, none.
 
Not finding it would also be very important as it would require a reworking of currently accepted theories. Although CERN does seem to be there or thereabouts with finding it. :)
 
They found it! The density of the particle has been consistent on both ends of C.E.R.N. . Mass ~ 125(GeV). Practical applications are currently none but c'mon?!? It is vital to define the makeup of our universe and the confirmation of it will establish validity of current equations.
 
Bellsy69 said:
They found it!
No, they didn't. At least not yet. They have seen signs, but the statistical significance is not strong enough yet to allow them to unambiguously make that Eureka! claim. See http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2011/PR25.11E.html .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top