Quick complex numbers question in QM (probability amplitues)

phil ess
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
[RESOLVED] Quick complex numbers question in QM (probability amplitues)

Im a little confused here. I am reading in my textbook about probability amplitudes in Stern Gerlach measurements, and it says this:

We find the resulting probabilities for deflection of \left(\stackrel{\alpha}{\beta}\right) in the x and y directions as:

Prob(\pm in x) = \left|\frac{\alpha\pm\beta}{\sqrt{2}}\right|^2 = \frac{1}{2}(|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 \pm \alpha*\beta \pm \beta*\alpha) = \frac{1}{2} \pm Re(\alpha*\beta)

Prob(\pm in y) = \left|\frac{\alpha\mp i\beta}{\sqrt{2}}\right|^2 = \frac{1}{2}(|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 \mp i\alpha*\beta \mp i\beta*\alpha) = \frac{1}{2} \pm Im(\alpha*\beta)


Now I understand where the amplitudes come from and everything, the thing I don't understand is the functions Re and Im, and how they simplified the amplitudes to

\frac{1}{2} \pm Re(\alpha*\beta)

and

\frac{1}{2} \pm Im(\alpha*\beta)

So can someone please explain these functions Re and I am and how they work here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any complex number z can be written in the form z=x+iy, where x and y are real numbers called the real part and the imaginary part of z respectively. x and y are uniquely determined by this decomposition, i.e. if x'+iy'=x+iy, then x=x' and y=y'. So there exists a function that takes a complex number to its real part, and a function that takes a complex number to its imaginary part. These functions are called Re and I am respectively.

Note that

z=Re z + i I am z
z*=Re z-i I am z

and that this implies

Re z=(z+z*)/2
Im z=(z-z*)/(2i)

Now what do you get when you compute the real and imaginary parts of \alpha^*\beta?
 
OH! so:

1/2 + Re(a*b) = 1/2 + (a*b + b*a)/2 = 1/2 (1 + a*b + b*a)

but 1 = |a|2 + |b|2

so we get:

1/2 + Re(a*b) = 1/2 (|a|2 + |b|2 + a*b + b*a)

woohoo, thanks a lot!

EDIT: Ok I am not seeing the I am part though:

1/2 + Im(a*b) = 1/2 + (a*b - b*a)/2i = (i + a*b - b*a)/2i ??

I can't seem to get the result in the book of 1/2 (|a|2 + |b|2 - ia*b + ib*a)

EDIT: Oh you just multiply top and bottom by i and it works out! got it, thanks agian!
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top