Quick Fermi Energy QuestionFree electrons?

Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Quick Fermi Energy Question..Free electrons??

A quick question on the Fermi energy.

From a 3D cubic well, one can derive an expression for the Fermi energy of a solid:

Ef = h^2/2m . (3.pi^2.N/V)^2/3


Now, I have come across an expression where N/V, electrons per volume, is replaced by density over mass, times no of FREE electrons. Why is it the FREE electrons tho?? I thought the fermi energy was the highest occupied energy of the electrons at 0 K, which would include the bound electrons (in the ion core say) and the free valence electrons?

Perhaps this is because the formula above is derived from a free electron gas?

Hope someone can enlighten me on this, Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The valence electrons in a metal maybe modeled as a gas of electrons. Fermi energy or surface is relevant to the description of the valence electrons only. Bound electrons take no part in the metallic properties (usually).

It so happens that the effective excitations (quasi-particles) due to the interaction of the valence/free electrons resembles the original free electrons in the electron-gas model. This result is known as the Landau Fermi Liquid theory. So one can substitute these interacting electrons with the free ones. Only the mass of these new "electrons" also called quasi-particles is different from the original free electrons.

Hope I've not left you in more confusion. Should wiki/google "Fermi Liquid" theory.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top