Quick logic question,SHM, second order differential equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a particle in simple harmonic motion (SHM) subjected to gravitational and resistive forces. The key equation presented is mg - T - R = ma, which accounts for the tension opposing gravity and the resistive force acting downward. It is clarified that the resistive force always opposes the particle's motion, meaning it acts in the opposite direction to the tension. The confusion arises from the timing of the forces' directions during oscillation, but it is emphasized that tension and resistive forces cannot align in the same direction. Ultimately, the correct formulation must reflect the opposing nature of tension and resistance in the system.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
See attached diagram.
Taking downward as postive.
The particle is pulled down past its equiliburm position (e=l) by l/2 and then released.
It has mass m and is subject to a resistive force R.

Why is it that the equation is mg - T - R = ma [1]
as a pose to mg - T + R = ma.[2]

I understand that the tension will oppose mg, however as soon as it is released, it will oscillate upward and so the resistance will be downward, in the same direction as mg .

Or is it a case of the equation being derived at a precise instant in time, and so as it is pulled down , T will act upward, and R will act downward as it is pulled down. So the equation is derived at exactly the point of establishing the system?

However if you chose to establish the equation at the instant of release, when it moves upward and R is therefore downward, would the equation not be (2) - why is this? does T vary after relase also or...

Thanks alot.
 

Attachments

  • harm.png
    harm.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 457
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be Equation 2, in the sense that both the resistive force and the gravitational force point in the same direction. There is never any way for Equation 1 to be correct, because the tension and resistive force must always be oppositely directed (assuming by resistive force you do mean a force that always opposes the current velocity).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top