Quick q on gauss' law (cylinders)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Gauss' Law to determine the electric field outside an infinitely long charged rod. The key point is that due to the symmetry of the problem, the electric field E remains constant at a distance r from the center, regardless of the rod's radius R. This symmetry allows for the cancellation of height values in the equation, simplifying the expression to E = pR^2/2r(e_0). The confusion arises from the assumption that different heights should be considered, but all measurements are taken from the line of symmetry. Understanding this symmetry is crucial for correctly applying Gauss' Law in this scenario.
channel1
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show that the E outside an infinitely long rod of radius R with a uniform charge density p is E = pR^2/2r(e_0)


Homework Equations


gauss' law EA=q/e_0


The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to solve this and get the correct answer but I don't totally understand it. Why is the height the same value on both sides of the gauss' law equation when the radii are different values?
ie, shouldn't there be a h and an H since there's a r and a R? obviously the answer is no since the heights cancel each other out, but why arent they different values?
why isn't the final answer E = pHR^2/2rh(e_0) instead of E = pR^2/2r(e_0) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
because the distance is measured from center not surface
 
You are using Gauss Law, you are using it only because there is symmetry in this question.
All you measurements are symmetric. All radii start from the line of symmetry of the rod.
That way when you use Gauss' Law, the electric field E is the same at radius r from the center of symmetry.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top