Quick question about the flux density through a solenoid.

AI Thread Summary
The flux density through a solenoid is defined by the formula B=μ₀nI, where n represents the number of turns per unit length. It is noted that the magnetic field strength is uniform inside the solenoid, similar to the uniform electric field in a parallel-plate capacitor. However, measurements taken with a Hall probe indicate that the magnetic flux density B decreases as one moves from the center of the solenoid to its ends. This raises questions about the applicability of the formula, as it does not account for distance from the center. The discussion emphasizes the need to clarify the conditions under which the formula accurately describes the magnetic field within the solenoid.
rock.freak667
Homework Helper
Messages
6,221
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



the flux density through a solenoid is given by

B=\mu_o n I

Where n is the number of turns per unit length.

The number of field lines per unit area is proportional to B.

I am assuming that at or near the centre of the solenoid the number of field lines per unit area decreases so B decreases.
If that is true, then how come the formula stated above doesn't account for distance from the centre of the solenoid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not the flux through a solenoid, that's the magnetic field strength. The magnetic field is uniform inside the solenoid (like how a parallel-plate capacitor has a uniform electric field between the two plates).
 
Magnet flux density is the same as field strength?

The reason I ask is that there is a question in which a Hall probe measures tehe magnetic flux density in a solenoid. They take measurements fromt the centre of the solenoid(x=0cm) until the end of the solenoid(x=16cm).
The results showed that as the x increases, B decreased.
Then the question asked "What conclusions can be made about the (i) the region where the formula (B=\mu_0 n I applies"
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top