Quick question on exponential decay problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an exponential decay problem, specifically focusing on the differences in final answers derived from the same mathematical setup. Participants are exploring the implications of their calculations and the integration process involved in arriving at the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the steps taken in solving the integral related to the exponential decay, questioning the algebraic manipulations and the significance of the lower limit in the integration process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on potential algebra errors and encouraging the sharing of work to identify mistakes. There is a recognition of the importance of the lower bound in the integral, which has led to a moment of clarity for one participant.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a provided solution and the original poster's confusion regarding the final answer, indicating that the problem may involve specific constants and terms that are critical to the integration process.

ozone
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
I'm attaching the problem as a png. The top half is the question whereas the second half is the solution. I understand everything about the question until the ultimate answer

the final answer is: (r (constant) x0(constant) / k (constant)) * (1 - e^-60t)
as shown.

However I don't understand why my answer differs. I concluded the problem with
(r (constant) x0(constant) / k (constant)) * (-e^-60t)
This doesn't seem to be a basic algebra issue, and It is beyond my comprehension.

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • problem&solution.png
    problem&solution.png
    32.5 KB · Views: 592
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you have the same integral as they did? If so, just looking at the last step where they calculate the definite integral, you must have made an algebra error. If that's not the problem, can you post your work so we can look for where you made a mistake?

Perhaps you forgot the term with the 0 (the lower bound) when computing your definite integral?
 
I guess it could just be algebraic. I didn't quite understand why it was that they were taking 1 minus the e term. Could you explain please?
 
What is the value of the exponential when the lower limit of integration is taken (t = 0)?
 
oh wow now I see.. Thanks for helping me to see the obvious!
(I ignored the lower bound~)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K