Quick question on Pulley Force Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter frownifdown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a pulley force problem involving a block and a bucket. The initial setup includes a 32 kg block and a 1 kg bucket, with static and kinetic friction coefficients provided. The user initially calculated the net force incorrectly and sought clarification on which masses to include in the acceleration equation when additional sand is added to the bucket. It was suggested to analyze the system using free body diagrams (FBDs) for each component separately to derive two equations. The user ultimately realized they had neglected to include the 1 kg bucket in their calculations, leading to the correct approach for solving the problem.
frownifdown
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Alright, so I'm doing this homework problem: "A 32·kg block is connected to an empty 1·kg bucket by a cord running over a frictionless pulley. The coefficient of static friction between the table and the block is 0.41 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between the table and the block is 0.34." And I need to find out the acceleration if 6.1kg of sand is put in the bucket, which I figured out is 0. Now I'm trying to find the acceleration if 7.3kg MORE is put in the bucket.

I have my Fnet as +24.696. When I put it in the equation Fnet=ma, to solve for the a, what masses do I use. Do I have it set up as 24.696=(32+13.4+1)a? Because I have that right now and it's giving me .53 which isn't the right answer. Where did I go wrong in that calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like your net force calculation is wrong, maybe you have made a math error. Please show how you arrived at it.
It is often not wise to look at the combined system of masses in one fell swoop . You instead should look at FBDs of each part of the system separately, getting 2 equations with 2 unknowns you can solve.
 
Once the additional 7.3 kg are added and you find that the gravitational force is enough to overcome the static frictional force, you have to use the coefficient of kinetic friction to calculate that force. That should correct the problem.
 
I actually just figured out what I did wrong. I forgot to incorporate the 1kg of the empty bucket into it. Thank you!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top