Quick Question regarding Atomic spectra

AI Thread Summary
An emission spectrum can show wavelengths when an electron transitions from the third to the second energy level, similar to an absorption spectrum. When starlight passes through cool hydrogen gas, dark lines appear in the absorption spectrum corresponding to these wavelengths, as photons are absorbed to elevate electrons to higher energy levels. The wavelengths observed in both spectra are the same due to the consistent energy difference between the levels, regardless of the electron's direction of transition. Understanding this phenomenon requires a grasp of quantum mechanics. The relationship between emission and absorption spectra highlights the fundamental principles of atomic energy transitions.
convict11
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
An emission spectrum can contain wavelengths produced when an electron goes from the third to the second leve. So could you see this like in the absorption spectrum? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
convict11 said:
An emission spectrum can contain wavelengths produced when an electron goes from the third to the second leve. So could you see this like in the absorption spectrum? Why?
Yes. If starlight passes through realtively cool hydrogen gas, the light that makes it through will have dark lines corresponding to the emission spectrum for hydrogen. The reason is that the photons that correspond to the difference in energy levels of the hydrogen atom will be absorbed (to bump the electrons up to the higher level) whereas others will not be absorbed. The actual mechanism that causes this to occur requires an understanding of quantum mechanics and is not simple.

AM
 


Yes, you can see this transition in the absorption spectrum as well. In an absorption spectrum, the wavelengths that are absorbed by the atom correspond to the energy needed for an electron to move from a lower energy level to a higher energy level. In this case, the electron would be moving from the second to the third level, resulting in the same wavelengths being observed as in the emission spectrum. This is because the energy difference between the levels remains the same regardless of the direction of the electron's transition.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top