Quick question reguarding electrical field lines.

AI Thread Summary
Electric field lines are perpendicular to equipotential lines because they represent the direction of force experienced by a charge, which changes when moving between different potentials. Mathematically, the electric field is defined as the negative gradient of the electric potential, indicating that the field points in the direction of greatest decrease in potential. Physically, equipotential surfaces allow charges to move without changing their potential energy, meaning no work is done along these surfaces. When a charge moves off an equipotential surface, its potential energy changes, necessitating a force that is perpendicular to the equipotential line. This relationship underscores the fundamental principles of electrostatics and energy conservation.
jrd007
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Can anyone answer me a curious question. Why are electric field lines perpendicular to equipotential lines?

Is it because force and charge are inversly proportional or is there a more simple reason?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple different ways to think about this. One is purely mathematical, the electric field is defined as being the change in potential:

\vec{E} = - \nabla V

This isn't terribly intuitive though. A more physical way of thinking about it is realising that equipotential surfaces are surfaces where the charge will have the same potential energy. The charge can move about on a given equipotential surface without changing its potential energy and therefore without needing to change its kinetic energy in order to conserve energy. When the charge leaves the equipotential surface its potential energy changes and therefore its kinetic energy must change, thus requiring a force.
 
Why is the direction of gravity's Force radial (inward, downward)
while gravitational PE depends only on the coorsdinate "r"?
Places at the same potential are connected by paths of zero integrated Field, as in "zero Work", as in F perp. dx
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top