Why Does a Transverse Wave Show Particle Movement Downwards?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ibysaiyan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
AI Thread Summary
Transverse waves involve particle oscillation perpendicular to wave propagation, leading to confusion about the direction of particle movement at a specific time. The mark scheme indicates that particle P moves downwards at time 0.0s, which contradicts the initial assumption of upward movement. The question seeks to clarify the orientation of particle P on the wave at that moment. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the wave's snapshots and the relationship between the two curves depicted in the diagram. Clarifying these concepts is essential for resolving the confusion regarding particle movement in transverse waves.
ibysaiyan
Messages
441
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Now I know transverse waves have their particles oscillation 90 degree to their propagation.So for this question shouldn't the particle movement be "Vertically upwards at time 0.0s" for P.That's what I thought but the mark scheme I have been given states "downwards".
I don't quite get it. http://img141.imageshack.us/i/39942835.png/"
Any help will be appreciated. =]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Where would you locate particle P on the dotted curve "a short time later"?
 
Isn't the question asking for the orientation of the particle "P" on the bold line at 0.0s ?
Sorry I should have been more clearer in my OP.The question puzzling me is : 6 (b)(i)
 
ibysaiyan said:
Isn't the question asking for the orientation of the particle "P" on the bold line at 0.0s ?
Sorry I should have been more clearer in my OP.The question puzzling me is : 6 (b)(i)

The question is asking about the direction of travel of the particle at point P. The diagram depicts two snapshots of the wave separated by a short time interval.

So, where would you locate particle P on the dotted curve "a short time later"?
 
Oh dear I still don't get it...
 
ibysaiyan said:
Oh dear I still don't get it...

I'm not sure how to make it much clearer. Tell you what, why don't you explain, in your own words, what the two curves in the figure represent?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top