Radial pressrue given lateral strain

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdergance3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radial Strain
AI Thread Summary
To determine the radial pressure exerted by a cylindrical plug on the wall of a cylinder, one must first calculate the lateral strain using the formula (d_initial - d_final) / d_initial. Young's modulus is relevant for axial stress and strain, while Poisson's ratio can be used to relate lateral strain to axial strain. The next step involves converting the lateral strain into radial stress, which requires understanding the relationship between these variables. The discussion seeks assistance in calculating the radial pressure necessary to achieve a specified change in diameter of the plug. Clarification on these mechanical relationships is essential for accurate calculations.
mdergance3
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Imagine you have a cylindrical plug of plastic that you press fit into a hole. I need to determine the raidal pressure, radial stress, that the plug exerts on the wall of the cylinder.

Here is what I have so far.

Lateral Strain = (d_initial - d_final) / d_initial\

From what I understand the Young's modulus deals with axial stress and axial strain. I can use Possion's ratio to determine the axial strain given my lateral strain but I'm not sure how to go from this to radial stress.

Basically if I have a rod that changes diameters by x ammount, what radial pressure is required to do this.

Thanks for the help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can Somebody offer some help.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top