Radiation Dosage and Energy Absorbed by 69 kg Patient

  • Thread starter Thread starter keweezz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Radiation
AI Thread Summary
Alpha particles with an RBE of 13 deliver a 32 mrad whole-body radiation dose to a 69 kg patient, prompting questions about the equivalent dosage in rem and the energy absorbed. Participants in the discussion clarify that a rad is a unit of absorbed radiation dose and that mrad refers to milli-rads. The concept of Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) is discussed, emphasizing its role in comparing the biological effects of different types of radiation. Understanding these terms is essential for solving the problem posed. The conversation highlights the importance of foundational knowledge in radiation dosimetry for accurate calculations.
keweezz
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Alpha particles with an RBE of 13 deliver a 32 mrad whole-body radiation does to a 69 kg patient.

A) What dosage, in rem, does the patient receive?

B) How much energy is absorbed by the patient?

Can anyone help me with this problem? Stuck from the beginning..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi keweezz,

A good place to start would be to define the terms. What is a rad? What does RBE mean, and how is it used?
 
Radiobiological Effectiveness for RBE i believe..and mrad is a unit like a millimeter.
 
keweezz said:
Radiobiological Effectiveness for RBE i believe..and mrad is a unit like a millimeter.

Yes, a mrad is a milli-rad. But my questions was, what is a rad? Answering that will allow you to get half the problem done.

I think RBE stands for relative biological effectiveness; but those are just the words. How is the RBE factor used?
 
hm.. how is it used..? any thoughts?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top