Proof for Radiation Momentum Transfer to Perfect Absorber?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kenny Lee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the momentum transfer of a wave to a perfect absorber, with the textbook stating that momentum p equals U/c, where U is the energy delivered over time. A participant seeks a simple proof for this relationship and initially confuses it with the momentum for a perfect reflector, which yields 2U/c. Another contributor clarifies that for light waves, momentum can be derived using the equations for energy and relativistic mass, leading to p = E/c. They also provide an alternative derivation using the photon equation, ultimately confirming that p = h/λ. The exchange concludes with appreciation for the clarification provided.
Kenny Lee
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
My textbook states without proof that p, the momentum transferred by a wave onto a perfect absorber (normal incidence), is U/ c, where U is the total energy delivered in some time interval.

Is there a simple proof for this? Just something to help me rationalize. I tried equating kinetic energy to U. Then I set mv equal to p. But what I get is 2U/c, which is the p for a perfect reflector.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about a light wave? If you are the derivation is quite simple;

Momentum is given by;
p = mc

Relativistic mass;
E = mc^2 \Rightarrow \frac{E}{c} = mc

Combining the equations;
p =\frac{E}{c}

Using photon equation;
\fbox{E = hf \Rightarrow p = \frac{hf}{c}}

I think this is the answer your textbook is looking for. However, you can go further;
f = \frac{c}{\lambda} \Rightarrow p = \frac{hc}{\lambda c}
p = \frac{h}{\lambda}

Hope this helps :smile:
 
Last edited:
It helped. Thanks very much.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top