Radiation of an accelerated charge

In summary: So a photon is just a particular eigenstate of the number operator ##N =\sum_{\mathbf{m}} a_{\mathbf{m}}^+ a_{\mathbf{m}}##. In the theory, it is also customary to say that a photon has a certain energy and momentum. But these things are not just arbitrary, they are determined by the properties of the photon. For example, if a photon has a particular energy, then it will be able to excite other eigenstates of the number operator, and will produce light. If the momentum of the photon is particular, then it will be able to cause certain types of waves to propagate. But
  • #1
stoopkid
6
0
I am having a lot of trouble understanding this concept. It seems to be the intersection of many theories: electrodynamics, special relativity, and quantum theory. Classical electrodynamics and quantum theory apparently have two different conceptions of what an EM wave is; in classical electrodynamics, an EM wave is a continuous change in the continuous EM field surrounding an electron undergoing continuous acceleration. In quantum theory, the EM wave is a photon. But a photon has to have a certain frequency, but a classical EM wave could be a complex, possibly non-periodic wave-form, having a whole spectrum of frequencies. A photon doesn't have a whole spectrum of frequencies, so if quantum theory is right, does this mean there is a whole spectrum of photons being emanated from the accelerating electron, with probability of finding a photon of a particular frequency equivalent to the amplitude of that frequency according to the Fourier decomposition of the EM field of the electron? But if each photon comes in a discrete amount, does this mean that according to quantum theory, there is no such thing as smooth acceleration? It is said that EM energy is transmitted by photon particles, but I don't understand this if the only thing that approximates a photon with a particular frequency in classical EM is the electric field of a uniformly oscillating charged particle, and the particle does not necessarily have to follow such a path. The more I think about this, the less I understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This should help your mental picture: Photons are what you get by quantizing the electromagnetic field modes.

The other thing to bear in mind is that classical particle trajectories don't make sense in quantum theories ... because everything has a wave function, which is the origin of the uncertainty principle. So "smooth acceleration of the electron" is not a meaningful statement in QM.
 
  • #3
In quantum theory, the EM wave is a photon. But a photon has to have a certain frequency, but a classical EM wave could be a complex, possibly non-periodic wave-form, having a whole spectrum of frequencies. A photon doesn't have a whole spectrum of frequencies, so if quantum theory is right, does this mean there is a whole spectrum of photons being emanated from the accelerating electron, with probability of finding a photon of a particular frequency equivalent to the amplitude of that frequency according to the Fourier decomposition of the EM field of the electron?

Your confusion is probably caused by trying to understand light with what Jaynes called "the buckshot theory" of light. In this conception, light is made of "photons, which are discrete particles of light with energy ##\hbar \omega##".

Teachers and textbooks still teach this simple concept from 10's, because it looks so simple and apparently helps to understand many phenomena.

The problem with the buckshot theory is that all the wave phenomena appear as miracles, and also that absorption/emission of a buckshot light particle violate energy and momentum conservation, not to mention that probability that the buckshot will find the electron is 0 if they are both point-like.

The modern picture of light is little bit more complicated but also more satisfying. In the modern theory of light, classical or quantum, the basic object is the EM field, which is continuously varying thing in space and time. The basic tool of the theory are Maxwell equations, which are differential equations. (In the quantum version, there are also additional conditions, like commutation relations.)

But discrete particles of light with energy ##\hbar \omega## play no basic role whatsoever. The word photon is still used, but in different meanings. In the theory, it is most often used as a name for any state of the field from the subset of possible states that are eigenstates of the number operator ##N =\sum_{\mathbf{m}} a_{\mathbf{m}}^+ a_{\mathbf{m}}## with eigenvalue 1. For example for the first excited state of mode ##\mathbf m##, it is customary to say that there is 1 photon in the mode ##\mathbf m##.

The simplest example of such state is harmonically oscillating stationary wave in a cubical reflective box. The wave oscillates continuously with angular frequency ##\omega## determined by the mode ##\mathbf m##, and is associated with energy ##\hbar \omega##. But it is not a localized particle and does not just pop in and out of existence. The evolution of the field is continuous.
 

1. What is radiation of an accelerated charge?

Radiation of an accelerated charge refers to the emission of electromagnetic radiation from a charged particle as it accelerates. This radiation is caused by the changing electric and magnetic fields surrounding the charged particle.

2. How is radiation of an accelerated charge related to the theory of relativity?

According to the theory of relativity, an accelerating charge generates electromagnetic radiation due to its changing velocity. This is known as the Larmor formula and is a fundamental aspect of electromagnetism.

3. What is the difference between radiation of an accelerated charge and radiation of a stationary charge?

A stationary charge does not emit any radiation, as its electric and magnetic fields do not change. However, an accelerated charge emits radiation due to the changing fields surrounding it.

4. How does the energy of the emitted radiation relate to the acceleration of the charge?

The energy of the radiation emitted by an accelerated charge is directly proportional to the square of the acceleration. This means that a higher acceleration of the charge will result in a higher energy of the emitted radiation.

5. Can radiation of an accelerated charge be harmful to living organisms?

In most cases, the radiation emitted by an accelerated charge is in the form of low-frequency radio waves and is not harmful to living organisms. However, at extremely high energies, such as those produced in particle accelerators, this radiation can be dangerous and should be carefully controlled.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
451
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
706
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
821
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
773
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top