- #1
Les Sleeth
Gold Member
- 2,262
- 2
Scrapped . . . see my last post.
Last edited:
Les Sleeth said:Part One - Definitions
Personal Knowledge defined: Information from reality directly stimulating consciousness that is personally sensed, experienced and retained by consciousness.
How is this... since personal knowing is that which is retained, isn't this the other way around like you state in the next sentenceLes Sleeth said:Part Three – Conclusion
While overall personal knowing can benefit from the peripheral assistance of mentality (depending on the quality of it),
past experience = personal knowledgeLes Sleeth said:because mentality relies on and is conditioned by past experience,
when is this weakened and which part does it refer to??Les Sleeth said:it means the experience of the present is weakened.
Lost again... is experience of personal knowing the same as personal knowing ?? otherwise this one's new in the equasion.Les Sleeth said:Consequently, during the actual moments of thought processes, the experience of personal knowing is diminished.
I think I get this part, but It will come as no surprise that I have no idea how to handle this...:Les Sleeth said:Therefore, for the practice of radical experientialism, one maintains personal experience as the first priority of consciousness. For mental operations, one relies on the experiential classes as much as possible, and returns to the personal experience of the present as soon as possible after thinking.
:uhh:Les Sleeth said:The claim is, the more fully a human experiences the present, the deeper one's personal experience of knowing.
Les Sleeth said:(NOTE:Adding my own personal experience to that I’d say, the more quiet the mind, the greater the experience of the present.)
Sho'Nuff said:Shouldn’t this say "past information…………retained and recalled by consciousness", otherwise I don't see a difference between your personal experience and your personal knowledge definition
"Radical Experientialism Scrapped: My Last Post" is a blog post written by a philosopher discussing their personal journey towards rejecting radical experientialism as a philosophical concept.
Radical experientialism is a philosophical theory that states that all knowledge and truth can only be attained through personal experiences and perceptions.
The author scrapped radical experientialism because they found it to be limiting and incomplete as a philosophical concept. They also realized that it was not a practical approach to understanding the world.
Some critiques of radical experientialism include the idea that it neglects the role of reason and logic in understanding the world, and that it is too subjective to be a reliable source of knowledge.
The author explored various concepts such as rationalism, empiricism, and skepticism before ultimately rejecting radical experientialism. They also considered the role of intuition and perception in understanding the world.