Radioactive Decay: 56Co to 56Fe - Which Type of Beta Decay?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the type of beta decay between 56Co and 56Fe, with 56Co decaying into 56Fe. Participants clarify that 56Co has a mass of 55.9399u and 56Fe has a mass of 55.9349u, indicating that 56Co is less stable. The conversation highlights the need to determine which isotope is stable to understand the decay process, specifically whether it involves beta-minus (β-) or beta-plus (β+) decay. There is uncertainty about using the periodic table and half-life data to ascertain stability. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards 56Fe being the more stable element, suggesting that 56Co undergoes beta decay to become 56Fe.
Jules18
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
The problem states:

The mass of 56Co is 55.9399u,
and the mass of 56Fe is 55.9349u.
Which isotope decays into the other and by what process?

I know it's beta decay, but there are two types of beta decay and I'm not sure how to tell which one would happen. If anyone is more familiar with these kinds of questions than I am, I'd be really thankful for any help.

Thanks ahead of time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, which isotope is the stable one?

Knowing that then, in which direction is the β decay?

Proton to neutron β-

or

neutron to proton β+?

Doesn't the transition tell you?
 
I'm not quite sure what you mean by transition, but the question doesn't say anything about which atom is more stable.

Is it possible to tell from the periodic table?
 
Jules18 said:
I'm not quite sure what you mean by transition, but the question doesn't say anything about which atom is more stable.

Is it possible to tell from the periodic table?

By transition, I was meaning alchemy. One element to another.

The half life is certainly something you can look up I would think.

Without looking, I would intuitively think iron is a more stable element than cobalt. But you should check to be sure.
 
Okay thanks :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top