How Many 116In Nuclei Can Be in Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum number of 116In nuclei in equilibrium, given a half-life of 54 minutes. The initial calculations included converting the half-life into seconds and using various equations to determine the number of nuclei. However, several participants pointed out errors in notation, unit conversions, and the clarity of the equations used. There was confusion regarding the meaning of certain terms and the relevance of the mass of the sample in the calculations. Overall, the need for clearer communication and careful calculation was emphasized to facilitate understanding and problem-solving.
Apollo14LMP
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Can someone check this please ?

Calculate the maximum number of 116In nuclei (number in equilibrium) in the sample if the half-life of 116In is 54 m.


Homework Equations







The Attempt at a Solution



The half life is 54 minutes, converted to seconds = 54m x 60 s-1 = 3.24 x 10^3 s-1

(In2) / λ = In2 / 3.24 x 10^3 s-1 = 2.14 x 10^-4 s-1

A = R - λN(t) So, A = 10 s-1 / 2.14 x 10^-4 s-1= 4.67×10^4 nuclei

The number of nuclei in the sample N = mNA/A, where is the fraction of the isotope (atomic mass A) in the sample (mass m) and NA is Avogadro's number.

N = 4.67×10^4 x 6.022^23 / 116 = 2.42 x 10^26 s-1 Equilibrium activity = 2.42 x 10^26 s-1

Homework Statement

 
Physics news on Phys.org
That sure does not look like the entire problem statement. There seems to be an implied production of 116In that you have not explained.

There are 60 seconds per minute. Your notation is weird. You seem to be getting inverse seconds instead of seconds for the seconds equivalent to 54 minutes.

Can't figure out what the various things in A = R - λN(t) mean. Can't figure out how that has anything to do with the rest of that line, since you don't subtract anything from anything. Does not look like you have calculated λ, just used an equation it appears in, so the substitution is confusing.

That's enough places where you are very sloppy. I'm stopping. Maybe you could start over and be more careful?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In the capture reaction 115In + n 116In, 116In nuclei are produced at the rate of 10 s-1. Calculate the maximum number of 116In nuclei (number in equilibrium) in the sample if the half-life of 116In is 54 m.

The half life is 54 minutes, converted to seconds = 54m x 60 s-1 = 3240 s-1

(In2) / λ = In2 / 3240 s-1 = 2.14 x 10^-4 s-1

So, 10s-1 / 2.14 x 10^-4 s-1 = 4.67×10^4 nuclei

The number of nuclei in the sample N = mNA/A, where the fraction of the isotope (atomic mass is A) in the sample (mass m) and NA is Avogadro's number.

N = 4.67×10^4 x 6.022 x 10^23 / 116 = 2.42 x 10^26 s-1

Equilibrium activity = 2.42 x 10^26 s-1
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you didn't get DE's message; if you don't want to tell, that's fine. In the mean time you leave me wondering what you mean with N=mNA/A. Was m a given ? then why not tell us, especially after DE explicitly asks for the entire problem statement ? But I suspect m is not a given, because it's irrelevant.

How can you write N = ... s-1 ? Is s-1 the dimension of a number ?

Why care about N at all if you were given that the 116In nuclei are produced at the rate of 10 s-1 ?

What on Earth is In2 ? Never heard of that isotope !Please spend some time reading the guidelines and the tips and what have you, so you can write s-1 if that is what you mean with "per second" (which is NOT, repeat NOT the dimension of a half-life).

Oh, and: did you notice all your relevant equations have disappeared as if by magic ? No wonder there's nothing sensible coming out ! Please spend some time collecting and rendering the relevant equations.

This isn't meant as bashing, but really: if you want someone to help you (and there really are people about who do), you shouldn't make it impossible for them !

So start over with this simple exercise: there are ten 116In nuclei that get produced per second. If there are N 116In nuclei present, the number that decay per second is something like N/##\tau##. So by the time N/##\tau## = 10 s-1 just as many decay as there are being formed. What can be easier ?
 
The problem is in all aspects (apart from actual numbers and that we are here solving for a different quantity) equivalent to your earlier thread
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=766515
Why don't you go back and review that thread rather than starting a new one on the same subject? The replies you will get are going to be saying essentially the same as what I said there. Your main problem in that thread seemed to be interpreting what different terms were actually representing as well as unit analysis when adding different quantities.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top