Calculating Radioactive Decay: Estimating Age of Ancient City

AI Thread Summary
A 50-g charcoal sample from an ancient city has a carbon-14 activity of 200 decays/min, prompting calculations to estimate the city's destruction date. The decay constant and half-life of carbon-14 are discussed, with an initial activity of 255 Bq/kg being referenced from a textbook example. The calculations suggest the city was destroyed approximately 11,088 years ago, based on the ratio of final to initial activity. Participants emphasize the importance of unit consistency and the correct application of decay formulas. The discussion highlights the need for accurate initial activity values when estimating ages using radioactive decay.
ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Q: A 50-g chunk of charcoal is found in the buried remains of an ancient city destroyed by invaders. The carbon-14 activity of the sample is 200 decays/min. Roughly when was the city destroyed?

A: I used R = Ro*e^(-lambda*t) and t1/2 = ln2/lambda

t1/2 = 3.834*10^-12 s-1

and 200 decays/min = 3.33 decays/sec or 3.33 Bq

What is the initial acitivity/kg (Ro)?
The final acitivty/kg = 3.33 Bq/0.05 Kg = 66.66 Bq/Kg

Therefore R/Ro = 66.66/255

I then found the time to be 11 088 years

Can someone please check over this and see if this looks correct and advise of any corrections?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check the numbers (for instance, is the initial activity of C-14 255 Bq/kg ?) but the approach seems totally correct.

cheers,
Patrick.
 
What half-life of C-14 is used?

Be careful with units. t1/2 should have units of time.

1 Bq = 1 decay/s is correct.

The decay constant \lambda = ln 2 / t1/2, and customarily it is often expressed as s-1, but it should be compatible with whatever units (s, hr, days) are used for time, t.

I calculate a decay constant of 3.9455E-12 s-1.

Activity A(t) = Ao exp(-\lambdat)

So inital activity is A(t) exp (\lambdat).

So to solve the problem, one needs to know the normal specific activity for C-14 in charcoal. Where did 255 Bq/kg originate?

255/66.66 = 3.825 half-lives.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/halfli2.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/halfli.html

Useful calculator - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/raddec.html#c1
 
In the textbook in a previous example - it says that the C-14 activity in a living tree is 255 Bq - that is where i got that value from but i wasnt sure if i could use that value in this question - ie is it always 255 Bq in living trees?!?

The half-life is in s^-1 - therefore the answer would be in seconds and i just converted it back to years in the answer.

Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top