Radius of object in electric field

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the radius of a charged spherical object between two parallel plates with a potential difference of 100 V and a distance of 0.01 m. The electric field is determined to be 10,000 volts/m, leading to an electric force calculated from the charge of 20 excess electrons. The gravitational force is equated to the electric force to find the mass of the object, which is then used to derive the volume and radius. The initial calculation yields a radius of 0.92 micrometers, but this is questioned as potentially incorrect. A suggestion is made to round the radius to 0.9 micrometers due to significant figure considerations.
user977784078
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two parallel plates with opposite charges are 0.01 m apart and have a potential difference of 100 V. A charged spherical object has 20 excess electrons stays motionless between the plates. If the density of the object is 1000 kg/m^3, what is the radius of the spherical object?

Homework Equations



E=V/d
Fq=qE
Fg=mg
density=m/Vs
Vs = 4/3 pi r^3

The Attempt at a Solution



I equated the electric force and the gravitational force as they are equal.

E = 100/0.01=10000 vollts/m

Therefore, Fq = 20 x 1.602x10^-19 x 10000 = 3.204x10^-14

Fg=m x 9.81 (I am assuming that I don't need to use the universal law of gravity because I don't know how high the apparatus is off the ground).

Therefore, Fg=Fq => m x 9.81 = 3.204x10^-14 => m = 3.27 x 10^-15 kg

density = m/Vs => Vs = m/density = 3.27 x 10^-18

Vs = 4/3 pi r^3 => r = 0.92x10^-6 meters or 0.92 micro meters.

However, this answer is wrong.

Where have I gone wrong?

Thank you for helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not see anything wrong in your derivation and result.

ehild
 
I thought so. Must be a mistake with the automated quiz.
 
Have you tried 0.9 instead of 0.92? All your given values have only 1 significant digit.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top