Radius of the sun and earth not flat

quah13579
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. (a) Given that the distances to the sun and the moon are approximately 150 million km and 400,000 km respectively. and that the radius of the moon is 1740 km , estimate the radius of the sun.[Hint:k=9*10^9 Nm^2/C^2, g=10ms^-2) ]

(b) Ancient astronomers knew that the Earth was not flat because it cast a circular shadow during a lunar eclipse. state another observation that led them to the same conclusion


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



what I've done is:
(a). s = m (150 million km / 400,000 km)
= 1740 km * 375 km
= 652,500 km

(b). Ships at sea can be seen farther away from a higher vantage point.

Am I right about those two question? For (a) how do I use hint to do this?
Thank you for any idea that help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi quah13579! :smile:

yes, your answer to (a) is fine (i assume you're using the fact that the moon is only just large enough to eclipse the sun :wink:)

i think the hint is wrong (or maybe it's the right hint to the wrong question) … it's presumably
intended to enable you to compare the centripetal acceleration with Newton's law of gravitation, but the radius of the sun (or moon) isn't relevant to that! :rolleyes:

your answer to (b) is true, but it's not really an astronomical observation, is it?

hint: how did the ancient greeks measure the Earth's radius? :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top