- #1

- 301

- 0

i thought about it. it shed no new light on the current topic at hand, what did you want me to do. tell him "thanks but that's worthless"I'm sure that Hurkyl doesn't need to ask you any questions. What you are supposed to do is think about it, and try to learn something.

BS he doesn't say that anywhere. .99He did. He stated that the equation 0.999...=1 is a consequence of how equality is defined for real numbers. The conclusion couldn't be any easier to spot.

__9__= f(n) = 0 for n >= 0 and

f(n) = 9 for n < 0. 1 = f(n) = 0 for n > 1 and f(1) = 1 and f(n) = 0 for n < 1.

those functions are NOT the same. so if he SOMEHOW came to that conclusion that they ARE from THAT then he is blind

no he locked my thread because he needs some time to grow up, as do you.No, he's locking your asinine thread because it is a waste of bandwidth.