Random General Relativity conceptual questions

coopre
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I want to know if these are true or false, if false why are they

A geodesic is a path between two points in spacetime that maximizes the invariant
distance ds2.

A massive particle's rest mass increases with velocity.

If I re a laser beam in the general direction of a black hole, there is no way I
will get hit by any of the light from my laser.

A 4-vector can be both perpendicular and parallel to itself.

For a massive particle with angular momentum L orbiting a point mass, the
corrections dues to general relativity always make the radius of a stable circular
orbit (assuming it exists) smaller than it would be in Newtonian gravity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coopre said:
A geodesic is a path between two points in spacetime that maximizes the invariant distance ds2.
Technically it extremizes it. Whether the extremum is a maximum or a minimum depends on your sign convention (+--- vs -+++) and whether the geodesic is timelike or spacelike.

coopre said:
A massive particle's rest mass increases with velocity.
No, the rest mass is an invariant quantity and is the same in all frames regardless of the velocity in that frame.

coopre said:
If I re a laser beam in the general direction of a black hole, there is no way I will get hit by any of the light from my laser.
Depends where you and the laser and the black hole are positioned relative to each other.

coopre said:
A 4-vector can be both perpendicular and parallel to itself.
How do you figure this?
 
coopre said:
For a massive particle with angular momentum L orbiting a point mass, the
corrections dues to general relativity always make the radius of a stable circular
orbit (assuming it exists) smaller than it would be in Newtonian gravity.

Relativity can't always predict the effects of angular momentum correctly. The underlying Riemannian geometry just does not handle spin-orbit coupling. Check out Einstein-Cartan Theory for an (hypothetical) extension of Relativity and Riemannian Geometry.
 
coopre said:
If I re a laser beam in the general direction of a black hole, there is no way I
will get hit by any of the light from my laser.

It is possible for the laser beam to bend round the back of the black hole and come back at you. In extreme circumstances the photons can circumnavigate the black hole several times before coming back at you.

coopre said:
For a massive particle with angular momentum L orbiting a point mass, the
corrections dues to general relativity always make the radius of a stable circular
orbit (assuming it exists) smaller than it would be in Newtonian gravity.

If you can confirm that you are talking about a test particle orbiting a massive body such as a large black hole (and not an elementary particle such as an electron orbiting a nucleus) then I may be able to point you to the equations to resolve this question.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
84
Views
7K
Back
Top