Range of wavelengths from a laser pulse?

hb1547
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A 1 fs pulse of laser light would be 0.3 um long. What is the range of wavelengths in a 0.3 um long pulse of (approximately) 600nm laser light?"


Homework Equations


(delta omega)(delta t) >= 1/2
c = (lambda)(frequency)

The Attempt at a Solution


I replaced (delta omega) with 2*Pi*(Delta F), which I then replaced with 2*Pi*c/(Delta Lambda).

Then, solving for (Delta Lambda), I got:

Delta lambda = 4*Pi*c*(delta T).

This gives me 3.77*10^(-6) m, which is 3.77 um.

However the book claims the answer is 95 nm... I'm not really getting what I did wrong? Is this completely the wrong approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to use some calculus to relate the variations. If

f = \frac{c}{\lambda},

then

\delta f = - \frac{c}{\lambda^2} \delta \lambda.

You can deal with the minus sign by computing absolute values.
 
Hmm, so I gave that a try:

\Delta \omega \Delta t \geq \frac{1}{2}

\delta (\omega )= \delta ( 2 \pi f)

\delta \omega = 2 \pi \frac{-c}{\lambda^2} \delta \lambda

Then, if I solve that for d(lambda), and plug everything in, I get about .95 um, which is an order of magnitude higher than what I wanted. Did I miss a power of 10 somewhere, or is that just a coincidence?
 
I found

( 600 10-9 m)2/(4 pi (3 108 m/s) (10-15 s) ) = 95nm
 
hmmm and this time I did get that, I must've plugged it into Mathematica wrong.

Thank you for your help! :]
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top