Ranking the force of point charges problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on ranking five point charges based on the force exerted on them by a uniformly charged insulating spherical shell. Using Coulomb's law, participants calculated the forces for each charge, focusing on the magnitudes rather than the signs. The charges were ranked in ascending order of force magnitude, with a common factor of qQ/d² simplifying the comparison. Clarification was provided that negative signs should be disregarded when ranking by magnitude, as the task only requires the size of the forces. Ultimately, understanding the concept of magnitude was emphasized as crucial for solving the problem correctly.
macaco
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



5 point charges;
q1; charge = +q distance = d
q2; charge = +2q distance = 3d
q3; charge = -3q distance = 2d
q4; charge = -4q distance = 3d
q5; charge = -5q distance = 2d
are placed in the vicinity of an insulating spherical shell with a charge (+Q), distributed uniformly over its surface.
Rank the point charges in order of the increasing magnitude of force exerted on them by the sphere. Indicate all ties where appropriate. Show all calculations of force.

Homework Equations



Coulomb's law;
F= K (q1)(q2)
---------​
r^2​

The Attempt at a Solution


I've applied coulomb's law to each of the charges, substituting each of the values in;


q1=> F= K Qq
-----​
d^2​

q2=> F= K 2Qq
------​
3d^2​

q3=> F= K -3Qq
------​
4d^2​

q4=> F= K -4Qq
------​
9d^2​

q5=> F= K -5Qq
-------​
4d^2​

I'm still not sure how to rank the equations after I've substituted the values?
I.e.- How do I tell which is higher when I have no numerical value for each?

should I be solving the equations somehow?

Any help much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi macaco! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

This is really messy, and almost unreadable …

do everything as a factor of qQ/d2

and forget the signs (the + or -) … they're only asking for the magnitudes, so it doesn't matter. :wink:
 
You're a legend Tiny Tim.
(The legend of Tiny Tim; sounds like a good book title =P)

Didn't think of taking out a common factor.

The charges in ascending order, according to the values left would be;
q2=> 0.66
q1=> 1
q4=> 1.33
q3=> 1.5
q5=> 2.5

(hopefully)

Thanks again TT

=]
 
The one thing I did not understand, is why you would not use the negative symbols, and rank the negatives below the positives?
 
Hi macaco! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
macaco said:
The one thing I did not understand, is why you would not use the negative symbols, and rank the negatives below the positives?

Because the question specified …
macaco said:
Rank the point charges in order of the increasing magnitude of force …

and the definition of "magnitude" is that you're only interested in the size, not the direction …

so the magnitude of a negative number -x is x, the magnitude of a vector (such as force) is its length, and the magnitude of a complex number a + ib = re is √(a2 + b2) = r. :wink:
 
thanks again TT
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top