Rare Earth Elements: Extracting from Nuclear Waste?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Biosyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Elements
AI Thread Summary
Rare Earth elements (REEs) can potentially be extracted from nuclear waste using chemical methods, such as wet processing or pyrochemical techniques. Despite the theoretical possibility, the extraction faces challenges due to the radioactivity of some isotopes. The supply of REEs is more of an economic issue than a technical one, as China maintains a competitive advantage with its established mining operations. The U.S. has abundant REEs but has ceased large-scale mining, making it difficult to restart operations. Additionally, while there is a perception of a shortage in high-tech manufacturing, the actual availability of REEs is significant, with new reserves discovered in places like Afghanistan. Current global production of REEs is around 70,000 tons per year, while the total inventory of high-level nuclear waste is approximately 65,000 tons, suggesting that even if a small percentage contained REEs, the yield would be minimal, potentially only a month's supply. This raises questions about the economic viability of extracting REEs from nuclear waste.
Biosyn
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
How are rare Earth elements and minerals extracted from nuclear waste?
And I know that some people are saying that there is a low supply of rare Earth elements needed in high tech manufacturing, could that shortage be solved by extracting these rare elements from nuclear waste?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
There's no shortage of the elements themselves, IIRC. We have plenty of them in the US. The trouble is that we stopped mining them and restarting that sort of mining operation on a large scale requires that a great deal of inertia be overcome. The Chinese never stopped mining them, so they have a fully operational system in place that would be hard to catch up with.
 
Biosyn said:
How are rare Earth elements and minerals extracted from nuclear waste?
And I know that some people are saying that there is a low supply of rare Earth elements needed in high tech manufacturing, could that shortage be solved by extracting these rare elements from nuclear waste?
Extraction of rare Earth elements could be done chemically in wet process or pyrochemically (in a nonaqueous system).

http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/3303742.pdf
http://www.oecd-nea.org/science/docs/pubs/nea5427-pyrochemical.pdf

However, one detriment to that plan is that some of the isotopes are still radioactive.

The availability of RE elements is largely an economic issue than a technical issue. China has a huge supply and they can undercut the market.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its an economic and a military issue. A poor man sells whatever he can part with whenever he can, while the rich man maintains stockpiles for emergencies and sells whenever the price goes up. The US is wealthy so it often only encourages selling specific resources when the price goes up. For example, seafood farming is now a 70 billion dollar industry in the US. The government saw the world supplies diminishing and at the appropriate time encouraged growth in aquaculture. Some rare Earth's are more rare then others and demand for them is projected to increase dramatically in the coming decades.
 
Biosyn said:
How are rare Earth elements and minerals extracted from nuclear waste?
And I know that some people are saying that there is a low supply of rare Earth elements needed in high tech manufacturing, could that shortage be solved by extracting these rare elements from nuclear waste?

Let's put your question in perspective. The world production of rare Earth elements is about 70,000 tons/year. The total world inventory of high-level wast eis about 65,000 tons. So even if 10% of it is rare Earth's (which I doubt) and you reprocessed all of it, you would only generate about one months supply. Does this sound worth it to you?
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top