Chemistry Solve Log Rate Law Problem | Step-by-Step Guide for Optimal Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter r12214001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Rate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a logarithmic rate law problem, specifically addressing the calculation of log values. It clarifies that the logarithm and antilogarithm effectively cancel each other out in the equation presented. The participants confirm that the natural logarithm of 0.1 equals -2.303, derived from the properties of logarithms. This understanding is essential for accurately applying logarithmic functions in rate law calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping these logarithmic principles for optimal results in problem-solving.
r12214001
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
calculation
Relevant Equations
log problem
my question is in fig.
圖片1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
log0.1=-2.303
because that is what it is when you calculate it
did you calculate it?

you do not need to calculate it thought as the log and antilog cancel
$$\mathrm{antilog}(-1.040+\log(0.010))=\mathrm{antilog}(-1.040)\cdot\mathrm{antilog}(\log(0.100))
=\mathrm{antilog}(-1.040)\cdot(0.100)$$
 
ln means natural logarithm, base e.
 
TKS i get it
 
$$\ln{0.1}=\ln{\left(\frac{1}{10}\right)}=\ln{1}-\ln{10}=0-2.303=-2.303$$
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
23K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top