Rate of Heat Absorption from Visible vs Infrared Light

AI Thread Summary
An experiment with a Crookes's Radiometer showed it spun 30% faster under a 100W 2360 lm bulb compared to a 100W 1600 lm bulb, despite both emitting the same energy. The discussion explored the relationship between light absorption and the spectrum of radiation, with a focus on whether higher frequency correlates with higher absorption rates. It was clarified that the absorption rate is complex and depends on the material's composition and the frequency of the radiation. Different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum interact differently with materials, influencing their absorption characteristics. Understanding these interactions requires delving into the theoretical aspects of light and material properties.
sphoenixee
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I recently did an experiment with the Crookes's Radiometer.

The radiometer was first placed under a 100W 1600 lm bulb and then a 100 W 2360 lm bulb. Though they both emit the same energy, the radiometer spun about 30% faster under the 2360 lm.

Why is this? I was thinking maybe this was because visible light is absorbed faster than the infrared, but don't know for sure.

Thanks,

sphoenixee
 
Science news on Phys.org
You're right. In general, the amount of energy absorbed by a surface depends on both the intensity and spectrum of the radiation hitting it.
 
Just to clarify, it's the higher the spectrum, the higher the absorption rate?
 
Just to clarify, it's the higher the spectrum, the higher the absorption rate?

What do you mean by "higher the spectrum" - more intensity or higher frequency?
 
What do you mean by "higher the spectrum" - higher frequency or higher intensity?

In the case of frequency, there is no simple relationship - it depends specifically on the composition of the material.
 
Sorry about all the repeated messages. I was experiencing internet problems so I couldn't tell what went through.
 
My bad, but yes, I meant the higher the frequency. So the relationship between absorption rate and frequency is empirical? Or is there just a complicated relationship? Does anyone know of any good articles about this?

Thanks,

sphoenixee
 
It is not quite empirical. There is a lot of theory there, but it is quite complicated, depending on the composition of the surface as well as the frequency of the radiation. the simplest example would be the fact that a red surface reflects red and absorbs other colors, while a blue surface reflects blue and absorbs others (this is overly simplified). Different parts of the spectrum (ranging from radio waves to gamma rays) alll act differently. Low frequency such as microwaves interact with molecules, while higher frequencies such as gammma rays interact with electrons and nuclei.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for clearing that up mathman!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top