Rate of water flow into an immersed container

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the rate of water flow into an immersed container with a hole, one must consider the differential pressure across the hole, which is influenced by the water depth and the internal pressure from trapped air. The pressure difference is determined by the hydrostatic pressure at the hole minus the pressure from the air inside the box. A precise analysis requires detailed information about the container's dimensions, orientation, and the characteristics of the hole. While measurement instruments can be used, theoretical calculations may be more straightforward. For further understanding, studying computational fluid dynamics is recommended.
SonfusedCoul
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am wondering how I may calculate the rate of water flow into a container(say, a empty box) with a hole in it, and with the whole box immersed in water. Does it have something to do with the force of water pushing against the container, and calculating how fast water can flow through the hole as a result of that force? Or do you assume the hole is a pipe of small width, and use the equation of continuity from there?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
You could consider the differential pressure available across the hole and compute the acceleration of the water needed to get it through the hole. Don't forget the rising internal pressure due to air that may be inside the empty box. It is escape of that air that may regulate the filling of the box.
 
Thank you for the reply!

My physics knowledge is quite limited, so I'm still unsure as to how could I find the differential pressure. Will I need to use a measurement instrument and physically measure the difference in pressure outside and inside of the box, and/or is it possible to find theoretically? I am also unsure of the equations and relationships that link the acceleration of the water to the pressure. I've tried to find some resources on this, but I've only seen posts about leakages from a container, not into one. Are there any search terms/ that I should be using for this?
 
There is no one equation that will answer such a hypothetical situation.
We need a better description of the system you are trying to analyse. Is it a submarine or a glass bottle?
You will need to identify the initial condition, is the box really empty or does it contain air at atmospheric pressure?
What are the dimensions and orientation, of the box and the hole?
How thick is the wall of the box at the hole?
How deep is the hole in the box below the surface? Is it submerged in sea water of fresh water?

The pressure difference is the hydrostatic pressure due to water depth at the hole, less the rising pressure inside the box as it fills.
It is easier to calculate pressures than to measure.

Unless you can better describe the problem here, the only answer will be to suggest you study computational fluid dynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes SonfusedCoul
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top