Ratio of angular speed with conservation of energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of angular velocities of a ball rolling down an incline at heights h/3 and 2h/3 using conservation of energy principles. The user derived expressions for the angular velocities at both heights, concluding a ratio of 2:1 for the squared angular velocities, which simplifies to sqrt(2):1 for the angular velocities themselves. There is confusion regarding whether "at h/3" refers to the height measured from the top or bottom of the incline, impacting the interpretation of the problem. Participants express frustration over the ambiguity of the question and its implications for upcoming exams. Clarification on the height measurement is sought, indicating potential errors in the problem's formulation.
RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


  1. A ball rolls down an incline plane without slipping. What is the ratio of its angular velocity at h/3 to its angular velocity at 2h/3?
    1) 1:2
  2. 2) 1:sqrt(2)
  3. 3) 1:1
  4. 4) sqrt(2):1
  5. 5) 2:1

Homework Equations


Conservation of energy with provisions for rotational and translational motion.

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi everyone!

I got this funky problem today. Here's what I tried to do:

at h/3 I have potential energy resulting from lowering the ball a height of 2*h/3 that is converted to kinetic energy.

Thus, I did the following
m * g * (2h/3) = [(1 / 2) * m * v^2] + [(1 / 2 ) * I * omega^2]
m * g * (2h/3) = [(1 / 2) * m * v^2] + [(1 / 2 ) * (2 / 5) * m * r^2 * (v^2 / r^2)]

Rearrange to get an expression with v, and then substitute v = r * omega to get
(20 * h * g)/ (21 * r^2) = omega^2 for the h/3 height

OK. then I said that at height 2h/3 I have potential energy from descending h/3 converted to kinetic energy
m * g * (h/3) = [(1 / 2) * m * v^2] + [(1 / 2 ) * I * omega^2]
m * g * (h/3) = [(1 / 2) * m * v^2] + [(1 / 2 ) * (2 / 5) * m * r^2 * (v^2 / r^2)]

Rearrange to get an expression with v and then substitute v = r * omega to get
(10 * g * h) / (21 * r^2 ) = omega squared.

Thus, my ratio would have been for the two omega squared terms to be:
(20 * h * g)/ (21 * r^2) = omega^2 for the h/3 height : (10 * g * h) / (21 * r^2 ) = omega squared. for the 2h/3 height

Simplifying the ratio for the omega squared gives 20 : 10 -----> 2:1.
Taking the square root to compare just for the omegas gives sqrt(2) : 1.

Thus, I got 4. The answer according to the writers is 2.

Why is this the case?

Thanks a lot for the help in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not entirely clear what "at h/3" means. Is that h/3 from the bottom or from the top? Is there any further information that clarifies this?
 
They did not provide any information. I believe that 'h' corresponds to the height at which the ball is initially launched on the ramp.
 
RoboNerd said:
They did not provide any information. I believe that 'h' corresponds to the height at which the ball is initially launched on the ramp.
Sure, but that still doesn't nail down the meaning of "at h/3". It could still be measured from top or from bottom. Measured from bottom, your answer is correct.
 
I have no idea... these authors write really crummy questions, which does not help as I have a final on monday. :-(
 
RoboNerd said:
I have no idea... these authors write really crummy questions, which does not help as I have a final on monday. :-(
So you quoted the question exactly as given to you, word for word, and there is no diagram?
 
Yes, sir!
 
Yes, sir! I just assumed they had a ramp at an arbitrary angle, with it vertically ascending "h".
 
RoboNerd said:
Yes, sir! I just assumed they had a ramp at an arbitrary angle, with it vertically ascending "h".
Well, either they were thinking of h/3 etc. as descent, i.e. measured from the top, or they messed up and gave the wrong answer.
 
  • Like
Likes RoboNerd
  • #10
OK, thanks so much for helping and confirming what I did. Really appreciated!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top