Engineering RC circuit with rectangular pulse

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the voltage response of an RC circuit subjected to a 12-V, 100-ms rectangular pulse. Participants clarify the distinction between the voltage response and natural response, emphasizing the importance of accurately calculating the Thevenin resistance to determine the time constant. The circuit behavior is broken into two phases: charging during the pulse and discharging after it ends. The capacitor initially charges towards a peak voltage, then discharges back to 0V once the pulse ceases. The final solution involves expressing the voltage response as a piecewise function without using the unit step function.
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


Consider the circuit below. If the source υs represents a 12-V, 100-ms-long rectangular pulse that starts at t = 0 and the
element values are R1 = 6 kΩ, R2 = 2 kΩ, R3 = 4 kΩ, and C = 15 μF, determine the voltage response υ(t) for t ≥ 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to use this slide as a platform to start the problem, but I am not sure what the voltage response is vs. natural response, and where I should do the timeshift. Also, I wasn't sure if my thevenin resistance to find the time constant was correct.
 

Attachments

  • 7.4 attempt 1.pdf
    7.4 attempt 1.pdf
    140.2 KB · Views: 329
  • Rectangular Pulse.pdf
    Rectangular Pulse.pdf
    61.2 KB · Views: 422
  • 7.4.png
    7.4.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 580
  • 7.4 attempt 1.jpg
    7.4 attempt 1.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 579
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Maylis,

Your Thevenin resistance that the capacitor "sees" is not correct; the two 6k branches are not in series from the capacitor's point of view. This is throwing off your time constant value.

A suggestion: Consider first the case where the input is simply a unit step and write the expression for the capacitor voltage. Determine its value at time t = 100 ms. So, what are the then-current conditions of the circuit at t = 100+ ms?
 
Is it okay to essentially treat it as if it was not a step function, solve it as such, and then at the end tweak the answer to include the time shift by subtracting the time (in this case 100ms)?
 
Maylis said:
Is it okay to essentially treat it as if it was not a step function, solve it as such, and then at the end tweak the answer to include the time shift by subtracting the time (in this case 100ms)?

I don't know how you could treat it as not being a step function initially. It clearly is. The applied voltage is said to be a rectangular pulse, so the initial transition is from 0V to 12V, the leading edge of a suitably scaled unit step.

An approach is to break the circuit activity into easily understood sections. First the input transitions from 0V to 12V. That invokes a certain behavior in terms of the capacitor voltage, at least for the ensuing 100 ms; it's charging from 0V towards a final value determined by the resistor network surrounding the capactitor. But at the end of 100 ms the input voltage drops from 12V to 0V, curtailing the charging process. So you have the capacitor with whatever voltage it had at that instant now discharging towards 0V.

So the capacitor will initially charge from an initial voltage of 0V towards some eventual peak. Before it gets there, at 100 ms the input changes to 0V so the capacitor now wants to discharge from whatever voltage it had attained at 100ms back down to 0V. So, sort of a sawtooth shape for the overall curve. You should be able to sketch the curve for both intervals, and calculate the voltage on the capacitor for t = 100 ms when the change between charging and discharging occurs.
 
Okay, here is my 2nd attempt. I tried to follow your directions..hopefully I succeeded
 

Attachments

  • 7.4 attempt 2.pdf
    7.4 attempt 2.pdf
    174.8 KB · Views: 324
  • 7.4 attempt 2.jpg
    7.4 attempt 2.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 522
Okay, that's a pretty good attempt! You've found the two "sections" of the response that are associated with the pulse rising and falling edges:

1) ##6 (1 - e^{-t/\tau})##
2) ##5.35e^{-(t - 100ms)/\tau}##

The only problem is that you need to add some mathematical "switches" to turn on and off their contributions to the overall function over the appropriate spans of t. For that the unit step function u(t) comes in handy... See what you can devise.
 
Okay, a little caveat. He said that we will not be using the u(t) function. Is there a way to do it without including it?
 
Maylis said:
Okay, a little caveat. He said that we will not be using the u(t) function. Is there a way to do it without including it?

Well, you could write it as you would a mathematical function comprised of separate pieces:

$$
V_C(t) =
\begin{cases}
\text{0 V}, & \text{for } t \leq 0 \\
\text{<first part>}, & \text{for } 0 < t \leq 100 ms \\
\text{<second part>}, & \text{for } t > 100 ms
\end{cases}
$$
Fill in the appropriate expressions for <first part> and <second part> :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K