RC Oscillator Circuit Adjusting Frequency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of adjusting frequency in an RC oscillator circuit while maintaining a stable amplitude. Participants explore various oscillator topologies and their implications for frequency and amplitude control, with a focus on using BJTs as required by a laboratory project.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that changing frequency in a phase shift oscillator affects oscillation conditions, leading to amplitude variations.
  • Another participant questions the choice of oscillator topology and suggests alternatives that might allow frequency adjustment without impacting amplitude.
  • A participant explains the requirement to tune both square wave and sinusoidal frequencies separately for additional points in their project.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical limitations of tuning multiple components in the frequency-determining network simultaneously.
  • Some participants propose considering other transistor-based oscillator topologies, such as Colpitt, Hartley, and Clapp, as potential solutions.
  • The Wien bridge circuit is mentioned as a possible alternative that could allow for a wide tuning range, but challenges related to decoupling from the transistor amplifier are noted.
  • There is a suggestion that a long-tailed pair (differential amplifier) might be a suitable solution for the requirements of the project.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about integrating the Wien bridge into their existing circuit design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to achieve independent control of frequency and amplitude. Multiple competing views on oscillator topologies and their feasibility remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of tuning multiple components in the frequency-determining network and the specific requirements of using BJTs in the circuit design. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions and conditions that may affect the proposed solutions.

freakywarlock
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am working on RC OScillator Circuit, but i had problems with adjusting frequency. I can adjust frequency but it effects amplitude too (amplitude is changing while adjusting frequency), how can i separate these two variables ? I mean, when I am adjusting frequency, I want to amplitude remains same, and also for amplitude too. By the way I am using this circuit : (Ignore the Op-amp Circuit, it is converting sinusoidal wave into square wave.)

41P47p.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In your circuit (phase shift oscillator) a frequency change will also influence the oscillation condition (Barkhausens rule). That is the main reason for the observed effect. More than that, the oscillation will disappear for a larger frequency shift as performed by you. From this, two qestions result:
1.) Why didn`t you select another oscillator topology which allows a frequency change (preferrably using one componenet only) without touching the oscillation condition ?
2.) If you need a squarewave signal, why didn`t you - from the beginning - use a squarewave generator?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and freakywarlock
Thanks for enlightenment. About your questions :

1) Actually, this is our laboratory project, and we have to use BJT in the circuit, that is why I chose this topology.(If there is another oscillator topology with using bjt let me know it, thanks.)

2) Laboratory project wants both sinusoidal wave and square wave, so after creation of sinusoidal wave, it is easier to convert it to square wave.
 
OK - I see.
In this case, some questions:
1.) Are you reqired to tune the frequency of oscillation?
2.) Over which range?
3.) How do you intend to tune the frequency (which elements are varied)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: freakywarlock
1) Yes. Also we need to tune square wave's frequency and sinusoidal signal's frequency separately for extra points but that is another topic.
2) About 500 Hz- 1500 Hz. But 1000 Hz - 1500 Hz is also acceptable.
3) I tried to vary the resistor R4 in figure, it gives a little bit change (around 250 Hz) but also there is a change in amplitude again. But now change in amplitude it is not too much, around 150 mV.

Thank you again.
 
As I have mentioned in my first answer - changing one of the elements within the frequency-determining network influences the phase and amplitude characteristic of that network and requires another gain of the transistor amplifier.
If the gain is not changed accordingly, there is only a relatively small tuning range (which depends on the amount of excess gain that is available).
Theoretically, you must tune all 4 resistors or all 4 capacitors of that network at the same time. However, this seems not practicle.
Therefore: Did you consider also other transistor based oscillator topologies (Colpitt, Hartley, Clapp9 ?
 
LvW said:
As I have mentioned in my first answer - changing one of the elements within the frequency-determining network influences the phase and amplitude characteristic of that network and requires another gain of the transistor amplifier.
If the gain is not changed accordingly, there is only a relatively small tuning range (which depends on the amount of excess gain that is available).
Theoretically, you must tune all 4 resistors or all 4 capacitors of that network at the same time. However, this seems not practicle.
Therefore: Did you consider also other transistor based oscillator topologies (Colpitt, Hartley, Clapp9 ?
I think the Wien bridge circuit will work with a BJT and can tune over wide range using a dual gang potentiometer.
 
tech99 said:
I think the Wien bridge circuit will work with a BJT and can tune over wide range using a dual gang potentiometer.
Yes - in principle, I agree.
However, the OP is required to use transistors (no opamps).
Hence, it is not easy to decouple the WIEN network from the transistor amplifier.
As another problem: The amplifier must have a positive gain of slightly larger than "3"!
Therefore, perhaps a long-tailed pair (diff. amplifier) is the best solution?
 
It seems I need to consider about the other topologies, I do not have any idea about where to insert Wien bridge into circuit.
 
  • #10
In principle, it is simple: You need a closewd loop of (a) the WIEN network and (b) an amplifier with a gain of "3" (or slightlxy larger).
But the problerm with transistor stages is: Both parts must be decoupled. This is not a problem for opamp based amplifiers.
 
  • #11
freakywarlock said:
It seems I need to consider about the other topologies, I do not have any idea about where to insert Wien bridge into circuit.

When searching for circuit ideas, remember...

There is a 2 transistor Wien Bridge oscillator here: http://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/bipolar_transistor_cookbook_part_5
though you'll probably have to build it in order to establish its frequency range.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LvW

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K