RC time Circuit; charge of capacitor as a function of time derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equations for the charge of a capacitor in RC circuits, specifically the charging and discharging equations. The user attempts to derive the charging equation but realizes they may have set up the problem incorrectly, particularly in assuming the potential drop across the resistor equals that across the capacitor. They express confusion about the relationship between the voltage across the capacitor and the resistance in the circuit. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly understanding the physical setup of the circuit to derive the equations accurately. Clarification on the potential gain across the battery and its relationship to the circuit components is sought.
sobie925
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys! New to physicsforums. I wanted to ask a more conceptual question regarding RC time Circuits. I spent some time trying to derive the equations, and I feel like I'm not setting up the problem correctly. Here's my attempt:

Solutions according to profecssor:

1) ##q_{charge}(t)=C\epsilon(1-e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}})##
2) ##q_{discharge}(t)=q_{0} e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}##

---
my attempt at solution 1
---

##q##-charge on capacitor
##R##-Resistance encountered in circuit
##C##-Capacitance of capaticor
##\epsilon##-Electromotive Force of battery
##t## -time since capacitor began charging
##\tau## - ##RC##
##i## -current


##C=\frac{q}{\epsilon}##
∴##q=C\epsilon##
##\epsilon=iR=\frac{dq}{dt}R##
∴##q=RC\frac{dq}{dt}=\tau\frac{dq}{dt}##
∴##\frac{1}{q}\frac{dq}{dt}=\frac{1}{\tau}##
∴##\int_0^t \frac{1}{q}\frac{dq}{dt} dt=\int_0^t \frac{1}{\tau} dt##
∴##\int_{q(0)}^{q(t)} \frac{dq}{q}=\int_0^t \frac{1}{\tau} dt##
∴##ln(q(t))-ln(q(0))=\frac{t}{\tau}##
∴##ln(\frac{q(t)}{q(0)})=\frac{t}{\tau}##
∴##e^{\frac{t}{\tau}}=\frac{q(t)}{q(0)}##
∴##q(t)=q(0)e^{\frac{t}{\tau}}##
So it's here that I'm like "I guess ##q(0)=c\epsilon## just for the sake of looking more like the professor's solution" <I realize how stupid this is... lol
∴##q(t)=C\epsilon e^{\frac{t}{\tau}}##

There must be something that I'm just totally missing here. The math seems right, so I'm thinking it's the set-up that I'm missing.

Any help is appreciated! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have assumed that the potential drop across the resistance is the same as that across the capacitor. Is this true or can you think of something else that is more physical?
 
Alright, so I started off on the wrong part. So, I need to derive ##V_{C}(t)=\epsilon(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}})## (This was written on the paper our professor gave us, so as of now it doesn't really mean anything to me.)

So, ##V_{C}=iR##. The current is the same as the current we've been dealing with, but what R is this equation referring to?
 
Let us start studying the charging circuit: Draw the circuit. What will be the potential drop across the capacitor and resistor respectively? What is the potential gain across the battery? How are those related?

For the discharging circuit: it is the same just without the battery.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top