Reaching any point mass configuration by internal forces

AI Thread Summary
Using only internal forces between N unique point masses cannot achieve every possible configuration due to constraints like conservation of momentum and angular momentum. For instance, three masses aligned on a line cannot escape that linear configuration, and two masses in orbit remain confined to their orbital plane. While internal forces can manipulate positions relative to each other, they cannot create net forces that would accelerate the center of mass. The deterministic nature of Newtonian mechanics means that given specific initial conditions, the system will evolve along a unique path. Therefore, while some configurations may be reachable, many are inherently restricted.
uekstrom
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If we have N unique point masses, is it possible to use only internal forces (i.e. forces between each pair of masses) to reach any configuration of the points (modulo rotations and translations)?

I assume this is well known, but don't know where to find a proof. Perhaps by induction from N=2 where it's obvious? Or of it's not true, I would like to find a counter example for some low N.

Edit: Ok, now I see that it cannot be true in general, for example three masses on a line can never leave the linear configuration. But is it true for "most" configurations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As internal forces cannot produce a net force on the center of mass, you cannot create any center of mass accelerations due to internal forces.

Another counter example is that N=2 masses orbiting each other necessarily orbit in a plane to conserve angular momentum. Therefore, they cannot move out of the plane of orbit.

In fact, Newtonian mechanics is deterministic, and with any specified set of initial conditions (6N conditions for 6 degrees of freedom for each particle) the system will only have necessarily 1 path of evolution.
 
That's why I wrote 'modulo rotations and translations', I consider two positional configurations equivalent if they can be translated and rotated into each other.

Edit: I should perhaps clarify that there is some means of controlling the forces between the particles, i.e. the particles can be spaceships connected by rods or something.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top