Reaching the Moon in 0.9 Seconds: A Physics Challenge

AI Thread Summary
To reach the moon in 0.9 seconds, one must consider the implications of traveling at relativistic speeds, as nothing can exceed the speed of light. The formula for time dilation is relevant, but the calculations indicate that the required speed must be less than the speed of light, which is a fundamental limit in physics. The confusion arises from interpreting the problem; while a stationary observer would measure the trip as taking longer than one second, a moving observer could perceive it as shorter. The calculated speed of approximately 130,766,968.3 m/s is indeed below the speed of light, confirming the constraints of relativity. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving advanced physics problems like this one.
iPhysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Nothing travels faster than light, which manages to get to the moon from the Earth in 1 second. However, we can still get there in a shorter amount of time. How fast would we have to travel to reach the moon in 0.9 seconds?

Homework Equations


I know the question is weird but it's in my textbook. I'm confused to what formula to use, I was thinking perhaps the formula for time dilation? t= t0/sqroot of (1-v^2/c^2) ?

The Attempt at a Solution


I put 0.9 as t0 and t = 1 and calculated v, but my answer is smaller than the speed of light, and shouldn't it be larger since the question states that we get to the moon in a shorter amount of time? I'm not even sure if I'm doing this correctly because it's in the advanced section of my book. Any kind of help would mean a lot to me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which grade are you studying?
 
No, the problem told you that "nothing travels faster than light" so the answer must be smaller than the speed of light. The point is that traveling slower than the speed of light, the time to the moon, relative to a person stationary with respect to the Earth and moon, would be larger than 1 second, but relative to a person moving, less than one second.
 
@adjacent I'm in 11th grade, which is almost the equivalent to sophomore year.

@HallsofIvy Oh I see. But is the formula correct? The answer I got after putting in the different values was v = 130766968,3 m/s, could that be correct? I'm sorry, physics isn't really my forte at the moment, especially the theory of relativity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top