Reaching the Moon in 0.9 Seconds: A Physics Challenge

AI Thread Summary
To reach the moon in 0.9 seconds, one must consider the implications of traveling at relativistic speeds, as nothing can exceed the speed of light. The formula for time dilation is relevant, but the calculations indicate that the required speed must be less than the speed of light, which is a fundamental limit in physics. The confusion arises from interpreting the problem; while a stationary observer would measure the trip as taking longer than one second, a moving observer could perceive it as shorter. The calculated speed of approximately 130,766,968.3 m/s is indeed below the speed of light, confirming the constraints of relativity. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving advanced physics problems like this one.
iPhysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Nothing travels faster than light, which manages to get to the moon from the Earth in 1 second. However, we can still get there in a shorter amount of time. How fast would we have to travel to reach the moon in 0.9 seconds?

Homework Equations


I know the question is weird but it's in my textbook. I'm confused to what formula to use, I was thinking perhaps the formula for time dilation? t= t0/sqroot of (1-v^2/c^2) ?

The Attempt at a Solution


I put 0.9 as t0 and t = 1 and calculated v, but my answer is smaller than the speed of light, and shouldn't it be larger since the question states that we get to the moon in a shorter amount of time? I'm not even sure if I'm doing this correctly because it's in the advanced section of my book. Any kind of help would mean a lot to me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which grade are you studying?
 
No, the problem told you that "nothing travels faster than light" so the answer must be smaller than the speed of light. The point is that traveling slower than the speed of light, the time to the moon, relative to a person stationary with respect to the Earth and moon, would be larger than 1 second, but relative to a person moving, less than one second.
 
@adjacent I'm in 11th grade, which is almost the equivalent to sophomore year.

@HallsofIvy Oh I see. But is the formula correct? The answer I got after putting in the different values was v = 130766968,3 m/s, could that be correct? I'm sorry, physics isn't really my forte at the moment, especially the theory of relativity.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top