Reactance and Inductance of an inductor

AI Thread Summary
The reactance of an inductor at a given frequency can be calculated using the formula XL = ωL, where XL is the inductive reactance and ω is the angular frequency. For the first question, with a reactance of 100 ohms at 2 kHz, the inductance can be determined by rearranging the equation. In the second question, to find the frequency at which a 3.5-mH inductor has a reactance of 10 ohms, the same inductive reactance formula applies, allowing for the calculation of frequency. It is important to remember that angular frequency is related to frequency by ω = 2πf. Understanding these relationships will help solve both problems effectively.
Kathi201
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
a. The reactance of an inductor is 100 ohms at 2kHz. What is the inductance of this inductor??

b. At what frequency is the reactance of a 3.5-mH inductor equal to 10 ohm?


I am not even sure what equations to use for these two questions. I know that for a the inductive reactance equation is XL = wL, but here I have two unknowns, XL and w so I am not sure what equation to use. For b the frequency equation I have is w = 1/LC but I do not know the capacitance.

If anyone knows the equations that I would use for these two I would appreciate the help ASAP! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) you have only one unknown because the angular frequency \omega is simply related to frequency by \omega=2\pi f .

b) Use the same inductance equation--not the capacitance equation you wrote down for b)!--solving this time for frequency.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top