Reaction Forces for Tension in a Rope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the reaction forces associated with tension in a rope, particularly in the example of an astronaut pulling a brick. It clarifies that tension is not a single force but results from multiple opposing forces acting on the rope. The reaction forces include the force exerted by the astronaut on the brick and the equal and opposite force of the brick on the astronaut. It emphasizes that the net forces acting on both the astronaut and the brick must be considered, as tension affects both bodies. Overall, the analysis highlights the complexity of tension forces and their reactions in a system.
assuredlonewo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What is the reaction force for a tension force. For example someone pulling a brick by a rope.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reaction to the brick's force on the rope is the rope's force on the brick.
 
assuredlonewo said:
What is the reaction force for a tension force. For example someone pulling a brick by a rope.
Dalespam says that the reaction force for the brick's force on the rope is the rope's force on the brick. This is true. He was being very clever and careful not to answer your question. The question asked for the reaction force for a tension force. There are always at least two reaction forces for a tension force because a tension is not a single force: a tension is the result of two or more opposing forces acting on an object, in this case, a rope.

Let's make your example of someone pulling a brick by a rope as simple as possible: an astronaut floating in space pulling a rope that is tied to a brick that is floating in space. And let's make the mass of the rope negligible ie. orders of magnitude less than the mass of the astronaut or brick.

In this case, you have the net forces on the two accelerating bodies (the astronaut and the brick) and tension in the rope. The tension in the rope results in two net forces: the force on the astronaut (mass x acceleration of the astronaut) and the force on the brick (the mass x acceleration of the brick).

It can never be the case that the reaction to a tension is a net force resulting in the acceleration of only one object. You could say that the reactions to the tension in the rope are the forces accelerating the astronaut and brick. Or, you could treat the tension as a kind of force conduit rather than a force and say that the astronaut is exerting a force on the brick and the reaction is the equal and opposite force of the brick on the astronaut. This is not completely correct since a rope cannot be massless so it is not strictly just a force conduit. But it is, in my view at least, a reasonable way to analyse the problem.

AM
 
Last edited:
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top