- #1

- 947

- 2

The terms the generator is delivering or consuming reacting power made me halt.

So I went back to my old course(which I allegedly passed) where the reactive power is addressed. I couldn't understand that back then(1 year) because I barley handled the phase angle, let alone problems of reactive power and its true meaning.

Consider a RL circuit. Plain. (or real inductor).

Solving the differential equation(which I didn't know how to do back then) gives me this:

for [itex] u(t)=U_m\cdot sin(\omega t+\theta _u)[/itex]

I get that the current is changing like:

[itex] i(t)=I_m\cdot sin(\omega t+\theta _u-\phi _L)-I_ m\cdot sin(\theta _u -\phi _L)\cdot e^{-\frac{R}{L}t} [/itex]

Lets discuss this:

We have 2 components. First component represents a steady-state current.

Second component represents a transient-state which slowly fades.

My question here is:

Do we say for an inductor, that is consuming reactive power?

If we make the angle of the voltage source u(t) such that it cancels the transient-state, did we in fact, "configured" that voltage source, to give OUT reactive power, and give it out just SO much that it cancels the "needs" of that inductor?

These are the questions for now, tons of other are awaiting, but first I have to make a clear distinction between giving out and consuming reactive power.