Real Analysis, Lebesgue, limit of an integral

purpleehobbit
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am absolutely lost. I had to take Advanced Calculus as independent study in a one month class and this book has very few examples, if any. I'm not even sure where to start on this one.

I have to compute the limit of an integral and then justify my methods according to the Lebesgue theory. I can also use Fubini's Theorem.

I have not started a solution on this yet because I don't know where to start. So perhaps I can just post the problem and then you can lead me somewhere where I might be able to see a similar example as to not violate the rules? I know I'm extremely new here but I'm not looking for someone to do it for me, I'm just having a horrible time finding a concrete example.

Thanks in advance, any help is appreciated.

(sorry, I don't know how to do the fancy equation editors)

Homework Statement



Compute the limit as n approaches infinity of the integral (from 1 to 2) of {x^(2-(sin nx)/n) dx}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have a sequence of functions (fn), and you want to find

\lim_{n\rightarrow+\infty}{\int{f_n}}

What you want to do of course is exchange limit and integral, thus

\lim_{n\rightarrow+\infty}{\int{f_n}}=\int{\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{f_n}}

but we cannot always do that. The good thing about Lebesgue integrals is that there are theorems that do alow us to do this (in certain cases): these are the monotone convergence theorem and the dominated convergence theorem. So I suggest you use this.

Let me give you an easy example: consider f_n(x)=x/n. We want to calculate

\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\int_0^1\frac{x}{n}dx}

naively interchanging limit and integrals gives us:

\int_0^1{\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\frac{x}{n}}dx}=\int_0^1{0dx}=0

But can we interchange limit and integral. Yes: by applying the dominated convergence theorem. Since on [0,1], we have \left|\frac{x}{n}\right|\leq 1. So 1 is a dominating function, and we have
\int_0^1{1dx}=1

Thus 1 is also integrable. This implies that the dominated convergence theorem is applicable!
 
micromass,

Thanks for your quick response.

I think I'm starting to see some understanding.

So I need to look at my fn. And as n approaches infinity, (sin nx)/n will approach 0 and I would be left with just x^2.

For the dominated convergence, I would have |x^2| <= 4 on [1,2]

And from there I take the integral from 1 to 2 of x^2.

Am I on the right track?

Thanks again for getting back so quickly.
 
purpleehobbit said:
micromass,

Thanks for your quick response.

I think I'm starting to see some understanding.

So I need to look at my fn. And as n approaches infinity, (sin nx)/n will approach 0 and I would be left with just x^2.

This is already correct, so you have found that

\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\int_1^2{x^{2-\sin(nx)/n}dx}}=\int_1^2{x^2dx}

IF the dominated convergence theorem applies! So, we must check now that the dominated convergence theorem applies. For this, you need to find an integrable function f such that

|f_n|\leq f on [1,2]

What you have done is this:

For the dominated convergence, I would have |x^2| <= 4 on [1,2]

This is not sufficient! You'll need to find a function f such that

|x^{2-\sin(nx)/n}}|\leq f(x) on [1,2]

So our function f must be independent of n! Furthermore, this function must be integrable!
 
Ok, I see what you mean.

Thanks.
 
micromass said:
This is already correct, so you have found that
So our function f must be independent of n! Furthermore, this function must be integrable!

Did you meant n or x?
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top